Do arterial resections improve survival in pancreatic cancer?-a narrative review

In this article, we outline the important features of pancreatic cancer surgery in cases with visceral artery encasement.

Despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, pancreatic cancer continues to have a poor prognosis. Due to its limited response to chemotherapies, radiation, or targeted therapies, surgery (in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy) is the only potential way to treat pancreatic cancer in a curative manner. As only about 20% of the patients have surgically resectable disease at the time of diagnosis, the resection of encased visceral veins and arteries, along with neoadjuvant regimens, is one approach to treat otherwise palliative patients.

Based on a selective literature review, we discuss the results of several studies and meta-analyses, comparing the mortality and morbidity, as well as long-term survival in patients undergoing arterial resection vs standard treatment. We conducted a selective literature review in PubMed without restrictions regarding time of publication or study design. Only articles in English language were selected.

Several studies and meta-analyses comparing resection with and without arterial resection and reconstruction showed a significantly higher post-operative mortality and morbidity and shorter long-term survival in patients who required arterial resection. In patients with tumors initially considered irresectable, the approach of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection with arterial reconstruction showed a significantly increased survival compared to palliative chemotherapy alone with acceptable postoperative morbidity. Tumor resection with arterial reconstruction following intensive preoperative chemotherapy (plus radiochemotherapy in some cases) should be considered in selected patients, as it can prolong survival and potentially lead to sustained freedom from tumor recurrence.