Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.3K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.5K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.5K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

3.3K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
3.3K
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

655
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
655
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

236
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
236
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

357
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
357

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Protein losing enteropathy and hypoalbuminemia after cardiac surgery.

Journal of cardiothoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Appropriateness and determinants of outpatient antibiotic use among migrants in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study.

JAC-antimicrobial resistance·2026
Same author

Vaccination Vexations.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Significantly Elevated Risk of Mortality: A Population-Level Database Study.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence chain-of-thought reasoning in nuanced medical scenarios: mitigation of cognitive biases through model intransigence.

BMJ quality & safety·2025
Same author

Concussions and risk of a subsequent traffic crash: retrospective cohort analysis in Ontario, Canada.

BMJ open·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

42.7K

Testing for a Sweet Spot in Randomized Trials.

Donald A Redelmeier1,2,3,4,5, Deva Thiruchelvam2,3, Robert J Tibshirani6,7

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
|August 11, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers identified a "sweet spot" for treatment benefits in patients with intermediate disease severity. This new method improves identifying which patients gain the most from medical interventions in clinical trials.

Keywords:
Gompertz functiondisease severitypersonalized medicineprecision medicinerandomized trialtreatment responsiveness

More Related Videos

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.4K
Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

42.7K
Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.4K
Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Randomized trials include diverse patient populations, some of whom may not respond to treatments.
  • Identifying subgroups that benefit most from interventions is crucial for optimizing treatment efficacy.
  • Current methods like stratification may not fully capture nuanced treatment benefit patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel statistical method for identifying a 'sweet spot' of intermediate disease severity where patients experience maximal relative treatment benefit.
  • To compare linear and sigmoidal models for assessing the association between disease severity and treatment benefit.
  • To evaluate the method's applicability using a landmark randomized trial on implantable defibrillators.

Main Methods:

  • Contrasted linear models with sigmoidal models (specifically the Gompertz curve) to describe the relationship between disease severity and treatment benefit.
  • Utilized the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to assess model goodness-of-fit.
  • Applied the sigmoidal model approach to a matched analysis of a randomized trial (n=2,521) investigating implantable defibrillators for cardiac patients.

Main Results:

  • The sigmoidal model demonstrated a significantly better goodness-of-fit (AIC=1,660) compared to the linear model (AIC=2,491), indicating a non-linear association.
  • Results suggest a 'sweet spot' where patients with intermediate disease severity experienced a concentration of survival benefits.
  • Model cross-validation confirmed the superior fit of the sigmoidal curve, highlighting benefits for patients in the midrange of disease severity.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic methods beyond simple stratification can effectively identify 'sweet spots' for treatment benefits based on disease severity.
  • This approach allows for a more precise assessment of relative treatment benefits across different patient subgroups within randomized trials.
  • The findings advocate for advanced modeling techniques to optimize patient selection and treatment allocation in clinical research.