Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2025

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
Published on: January 11, 2018
A theoretical analysis of longitudinal temporomandibular joint compressive stresses and mandibular growth
Objectives:
To determine if temporomandibular joint (TMJ) compressive stresses during incisor biting (1) differed between growing children over time, and (2) were correlated with Frankfort Horizontal-mandibular plane angle (FHMPA, °) and ramus length (Condylion-Gonion (Co-Go), mm).
Materials And Methods:
Three-dimensional anatomical geometries, FHMPA and Co-Go, were measured longitudinally from lateral and posteroanterior cephalographs1 of children aged 6 (T1), 12 (T2), and 18 (T3) years. Geometries were used in numerical models to estimate subject-specific TMJ eminence shape and forces for incisor bite-forces of 3, 5, and 8 Newtons at T1, T2, and T3, respectively. TMJ compressive stresses were estimated via two steps: First, TMJ force divided by age-dependent mandibular condylar dimensions, and second, modified by loading surfaces' congruency. Analysis of variance and Tukey honest significant difference post-hoc tests, plus repeated measures and mixed effects model analyses were used to evaluate differences in variables between facial groups. Regression analyses tested for correlation between age-dependent compressive stresses, FHMPA, and Co-Go.
Results:
Sixty-five of 842 potential subjects had T1-T3 cephalographs and were grouped by FHMPA at T3. Dolichofacial (FHMPA ≥ 27°, n = 36) compared to meso-brachyfacial (FHMPA< 27°, n = 29) subjects had significantly larger FHMPA at T1-T3, shorter Co-Go at T2 and T3 (all P < .01), and larger increases in TMJ compressive stresses with age (P < .0001). Higher compressive stresses were correlated with larger FHMPA (all R2 ≥ 0.41) and shorter Co-Go (all R2 ≥ 0.49).
Conclusions:
Estimated TMJ compressive stress increases from ages 6 to 18 years were significantly larger in dolichofacial compared to meso-brachyfacial subjects and correlated to FHMPA and Co-Go.
Related Concept Videos
Growth of Cartilage and Bone Tissue
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Normal Strain under Axial Loading
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Transformation of Plane Stress

