Routine Repeat Imaging of Pediatric Blunt Solid Organ Injuries Is Not Necessary
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2025

Whole-body PET/MRI of Pediatric Patients: The Details That Matter
Published on: December 19, 2017
Kelsey L Fletcher1, Mitchell Meagher2, Brianna L Spencer1
1Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Insights
Repeat imaging for pediatric blunt splenic and hepatic injuries is unnecessary. Delayed complications in children with these injuries are not more frequent when imaging is based on clinical changes versus routine checks.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Trauma Surgery
- Abdominal Imaging
Background:
- Nonoperative management of blunt splenic and hepatic injuries is standard in pediatric patients.
- Current practice shows variability in repeat imaging protocols for assessing delayed complications.
- Evidence suggests repeat imaging should be guided by clinical status, not routine schedules.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the rate of delayed complications and interventions in pediatric trauma patients with blunt splenic/hepatic injuries.
- To compare outcomes between repeat imaging prompted by clinical change (CC) versus non-clinical change (NCC).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of pediatric patients (0-17 years) with blunt splenic/hepatic injuries from 2011-2019.
- Patients categorized based on the reason for repeat imaging: clinical change (CC) or non-clinical change (NCC).
- Organ-specific delayed complications and interventions were analyzed by imaging group.
Main Results:
- 307 injuries analyzed: 174 splenic, 113 hepatic, 20 both.
- Repeat imaging occurred in 15.5% of splenic and 20.3% of hepatic injuries.
- No significant difference in delayed complications between CC and NCC groups; only 1 of 4 interventions was identified via NCC.
Conclusions:
- Routine repeat imaging is not necessary for pediatric blunt splenic and hepatic injuries.
- Clinical assessment should guide the need for repeat imaging in these patients.
- This approach can optimize resource utilization and patient management.
Introduction:
Nonoperative management of hemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic and/or hepatic injury has been widely accepted in the pediatric population. However, variability exists in the utilization and timing of repeat imaging to assess for delayed complications during index hospitalization. Recent level-IV evidence suggests that repeat imaging in children should be performed based on a patient's clinical status rather than on a routine basis. The aim of this study is to examine the rate of delayed complications and interventions in pediatric trauma patients with blunt splenic and/or hepatic injuries who undergo repeat imaging prompted either by a clinical change (CC) or non-clinical change (NCC).
Methods:
A 9-year (2011-2019), retrospective, dual-institution study was performed of children (0-17 years) with blunt splenic and/or hepatic injuries. Patients were grouped based on reason for repeat imaging: CC or NCC. The rate of organ-specific delayed complications and interventions was examined by reason for scan.
Results:
A total of 307 injuries were included in the study period (174 splenic, 113 hepatic, and 20 both). Of 194 splenic injuries, 30(15.5%) underwent repeat imaging (CC = 19; NCC = 11). Of 133 hepatic injuries, 27(20.3%) underwent repeat imaging (CC = 21; NCC = 6). There was no difference in the incidence of organ-specific delayed complications between the CC and NCC groups. Of the 4 patients with complications necessitating intervention, only one was identified based on NCC.
Conclusions:
Our data suggest routine repeat imaging is unnecessary in children with blunt splenic and/or hepatic injuries; therefore, practitioners may rely on a patient's clinical change.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

