Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2025

Stabilized Longitudinal In Vivo Cellular-Level Visualization of the Pancreas in a Murine Model with a Pancreatic Intravital Imaging Window
Published on: May 6, 2021
Effects of different breathing techniques on the IVIM-derived quantitative parameters of the normal pancreas
1Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, PR China.
Purpose:
To prospectively compare the differences in intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-derived quantitative parameters in different anatomic locations of the normal pancreas with different breathing techniques in a healthy population.
Method:
Twenty-six volunteers successfully underwent pancreas axial IVIM imaging with a 3.0-T MR system using 11 b-values (from 0 to 1000 sec/mm2) with three different breathing techniques: free breath (FB), liver dome scout (LDS), and phase scout (PS). The IVIM-derived quantitative parameters in three anatomic locations (head, body, and tail of the pancreas) were calculated. The intra-, inter-, and short-term consistency of IVIM-derived quantitative parameters were assessed by comparing 95% confidence interval (CI) of limits of agreement (LOA) of difference between measurements and clinical maximum allowed difference using the Bland-Altman method. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare pancreatic IVIM-derived parameters.
Results:
In Bland-Altman graph, the maximum values of the 95% CIs of LOAs of Dslow, Dfast, and f were (0.123 ± 0.022) × 10-3 mm2/sec, (22.093 ± 4.997) × 10-3 mm2/sec, and (3.942 ± 0.621)%, and the consistency of Dslow and f was good and that of Dfast was poor overall. The Dslow, Dfast, and f values of normal pancreas were (1.056 ± 0.121) × 10-3 mm2/sec, (55.755 ± 13.011) × 10-3 mm2/sec, and (26.036 ± 2.361)%, respectively, and there aren't any breathing technique (P > 0.05) or location (P > 0.05) dependent differences.
Conclusions:
Our study shows that IVIM-derived quantitative parameters of the pancreas may not be affected by breathing techniques and anatomic locations. The f and Dslow values have good repeated measurement consistency under different breathing techniques.

