Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2025

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
Published on: August 2, 2019
Sub-gap Fano resonances in a topological superconducting wire with on-site Coulomb interactions
1Institute of Molecular Physics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Smoluchowskiego 17, 60-179 Poznań, Poland.
Abstract:
We consider theoretically a 1D-semiconducting wire with strong Rashba interaction in proximity withs-wave superconductor, driven into topological phase by external magnetic field. Additionally, we take into account on-site Coulomb interactions inside the wire. The system is modelled by a tight binding Hamiltonian with Rashba hopping term and induceds-wave superconductivity. Calculations are performed utilizing recursive Green's function method, and Coulomb interactions are treated selfconsistently within Hubbard I approximation. For the Hubbard levels residing withinp-wave superconducting gap, particle-hole symmetric four-resonance structure develops in the density of states, apart from Majorana resonance. One pair of particle-hole symmetric resonances is created by the discrete II-Hubbard levels of the particular site, and the second pair of Hubbard sub-bands originates from recursive summation over the sites of the wire. Quantum interference between both types of pairs of states creates in-gap charge-conjugated Fano resonances with opposite asymmetry factors. We demonstrate that when quantum interference is dominated by two-particle tunneling, the Majorana resonance is strongly diminished, while it is not altered when single-particle tunneling dominates in interference process. We also discuss some consequences for experimental distinction of true Majorana states, and show that on-site Coulomb interactions support the appearance of topological phase.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Field Due to Two Straight Wires
Magnetic Field Due To A Thin Straight Wire
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Types Of Superconductors
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...

