Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Anaerobic Microbiota Research Using a Novel Respirometry Protocol
Published on: April 26, 2024
Energy efficiency assessment of China wastewater treatment plants by unit energy consumption per kg COD removed
Jinze Li1, Walter Z Tang1, Li Gu2
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Abstract:
Unit energy consumption per kg pollutant removed (kWh/kgCODremoved) is used for the first time in assessing and ranking the sustainability of main treatment technologies of 1215 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in China. The metric better measures the sustainability of main treatment technologies in WWTPs than unit energy consumption per cubic meter treated (kWh/m3). The energy consumption data of these WWTPs were selected from the database of 1399 WWTPs to evaluate the energy efficiency of different treatment technologies. 80.3% of the WWTPs applied anaerobic-oxic plus anaerobic-anoxic-oxic, oxidation ditch, and sequencing batch reactor as main technologies. Statistical analysis shows that the unit energy consumption of WWTPs decreases with increasing design flow rate, operation loading rate, and influent COD concentration. For example, the average unit energy consumption of SBR decreases from 2.76 kWh/kgCODremoved to 0.83 kWh/kgCODremoved when the design flow rate increases from less than 10,000 m3/d to 100,000-200,000 m3/d. The mean unit energy consumption of SBR decreases from 1.71 kWh/kgCODremoved to 1.32 kWh/ kgCODremoved and 2.85 kWh/ kgCODremoved to 0.63 kWh/kgCODremoved as the operation loading rate and COD removal increase from 40% to 100% and from less than 150 mg/L to over 450 mg/L, respectively. SBR has the lowest unit energy consumption among all the technologies. Therefore, SBR might be the most appropriate technology in small and medium-scale WWTPs in China. Regression equations were developed to predict the unit energy consumption for sustainable design treatment trains by input variables such as design flow rate, operation loading rate, and influent COD concentration.
More Related Videos
09:49Use of a Battery of Chemical and Ecotoxicological Methods for the Assessment of the Efficacy of Wastewater Treatment Processes to Remove Estrogenic Potency
Published on: September 11, 2016
05:40Comparison of Scale in a Photosynthetic Reactor System for Algal Remediation of Wastewater
Published on: March 6, 2017