Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

61.8K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
61.8K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

252.5K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
252.5K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

63.7K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
63.7K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

9.8K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
9.8K
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

14.8K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
14.8K
Data Collection by Experiments01:13

Data Collection by Experiments

26.0K
Data collection is a systematic method of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. An experimental study is a standard method of data collection that involves the manipulation of the samples by applying some form of treatment prior to data collection. It refers to manipulating one variable to determine its changes on another variable. The sample subjected to treatment is known as “experimental units.”
An example of the experimental method is a public...
26.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ground truth data set of Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GCMS) analysed synthesised methylamphetamine.

Data in brief·2026
Same author

Letter to the Editor: The International Forensic Strategic Alliance - A model in global forensic collaboration.

Forensic science international·2026
Same author

Evaluation of nitazene immunoassay test strips for rapid in-situ detection of nitazene and nitazene analogs in illicit drug samples.

Harm reduction journal·2025
Same author

Assessing skeletal maturity in a UK modern female population.

Forensic science, medicine, and pathology·2025
Same author

Automated segmentation of the breech and firing pin faces of fired cartridge case images.

Forensic science international·2025
Same author

A scientometric review of explosives research: Challenges and opportunities.

Forensic science international·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.0K

Novel scientific methods in court.

Lucina Hackman1, Niamh Nic Daeid1

  • 1Leverhulme Centre for Forensic Science, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Emerging Topics in Life Sciences
|August 17, 2021
PubMed
Summary

The admissibility of novel forensic science techniques in court presents challenges. Balancing investigative needs with scientific rigor is crucial for admitting emerging evidence.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic science
  • Legal system
  • Scientific evidence

Background:

  • Forensic science use in legal proceedings has surged due to scientific advancements.
  • Established forensic methods are widely accepted, but novel techniques face scrutiny.
  • A conflict arises between investigative demands for evidence and judicial requirements for scientific robustness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the implications of emerging scientific techniques in forensic investigations for court admissibility.
  • To analyze the tension between the desire to use all available investigative tools and the need for scientifically sound evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of forensic science applications in legal contexts.
  • Analysis of case law and judicial standards for admitting novel scientific evidence.
Keywords:
admissibilitycommunicationforensic sciencenovel science

More Related Videos

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.7K
Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement
07:32

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement

Published on: August 20, 2010

19.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.0K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.7K
Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement
07:32

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement

Published on: August 20, 2010

19.4K
  • Examination of the challenges posed by emerging scientific techniques in forensic investigations.

    • Main Results:

    • Novel scientific techniques in forensic investigations can create admissibility issues in court.
    • The pressure to use new tools may lead to the introduction of scientifically questionable evidence.
    • Courts face difficulties in evaluating the reliability and validity of emerging forensic methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Careful consideration is needed when introducing novel forensic science into judicial processes.
    • A robust framework is required to ensure emerging scientific evidence is scientifically sound and admissible.
    • Balancing innovation in forensic investigation with judicial standards is essential for justice.