Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

19.6K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
19.6K
Osmoregulation in Fishes02:32

Osmoregulation in Fishes

51.5K
When cells are placed in a hypotonic (low-salt) fluid, they can swell and burst. Meanwhile, cells in a hypertonic solution—with a higher salt concentration—can shrivel and die. How do fish cells avoid these gruesome fates in hypotonic freshwater or hypertonic seawater environments?
51.5K
Fixed Action Patterns01:06

Fixed Action Patterns

16.7K
A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.
16.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early prediction of declining health associated with helminth infection in small ruminants using accelerometers and machine learning.

International journal for parasitology·2026
Same author

Predators hide against similarly coloured species to camouflage on the move.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

A horizon scan of biological conservation issues for 2026.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2025
Same author

Structural and developmental insights into the muscles involved in lionfish (Pterois spp.) vocalisations.

Journal of fish biology·2025
Same author

Individual identification of bony fishes using unique body markings: Implications and applications.

Journal of fish biology·2025
Same author

Visual contrast from background features and dynamic illumination contributes to three-dimensional camouflage in cuttlefish.

The Journal of experimental biology·2025
Same journal

Traffic Reduction during COVID-19 Lockdowns Benefited Species Already Tolerant of Noise Pollution: An Acoustic Analysis.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

On Pachycephalosaurs, Trade-Offs, and the Historical Genesis of Sociosexual Display Structures.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Structured Landscapes Promote Persistence by Favoring Prudent Predators.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Can Carbon Economy Explain Leaf Dynamic Seasonality in a Tropical Seasonal Rainforest?

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Behavior and Physiology Outpace Form When Linking Traits to Ecological Responses within Populations: A Meta-Analysis.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Seminal Fluid Proteins as Regulation Factors for Optimizing Reproduction: A Modeling Approach.

The American naturalist·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 23, 2025

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

7.1K

Fish Avoid Visually Noisy Environments Where Prey Targeting Is Reduced.

Joanna R Attwell, Christos C Ioannou, Chris R Reid

    The American Naturalist
    |August 17, 2021
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Animals adapt behavior to avoid ecological noise. Three-spined sticklebacks avoided visually noisy areas by increasing activity, suggesting a strategy to mitigate impacts on perception and behavior.

    Keywords:
    Gasterosteus aculeatuscausticsenvironmental noiseperceptionvirtual prey

    More Related Videos

    Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
    07:09

    Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

    Published on: May 2, 2019

    6.3K
    Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish
    10:56

    Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish

    Published on: March 6, 2014

    12.7K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Oct 23, 2025

    A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
    07:29

    A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

    Published on: February 22, 2020

    7.1K
    Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
    07:09

    Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

    Published on: May 2, 2019

    6.3K
    Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish
    10:56

    Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish

    Published on: March 6, 2014

    12.7K

    Area of Science:

    • Animal behavior
    • Sensory ecology
    • Environmental noise

    Background:

    • Ecological noise can impair animal sensory perception.
    • Dynamic visual noise, such as light patterns from surface waves, is a common environmental factor.
    • Understanding how animals cope with visual noise is crucial for behavioral ecology.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate if animals adapt behavior to avoid or exploit environments with dynamic visual noise.
    • To determine the effect of visual noise on habitat selection, movement, and prey detection in three-spined sticklebacks.

    Main Methods:

    • Three-spined sticklebacks were exposed to simulated visual noise (moving light bands).
    • Behavioral responses including habitat selection, activity levels, and prey targeting were observed.
    • Refuge use was monitored to assess exploratory or risk-averse behavior.

    Main Results:

    • Fish actively avoided areas with higher levels of visual noise.
    • Increased activity correlated with perceived noise levels, facilitating avoidance.
    • Prey detection was impaired in visually noisy environments, reducing response rates.

    Conclusions:

    • Animals can employ behavioral strategies, such as habitat avoidance, to mitigate the negative effects of visual noise.
    • Dynamic visual noise impacts animal perception and behavior, influencing habitat use.
    • Simple behavioral adjustments can be effective in managing sensory challenges posed by environmental noise.