Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

12:03
A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
Published on: May 25, 2019
8.6K
Emergence of Frequency-Dependent Motor Variability Within Supra-Second Auditory Cueing
Premjit Khanganba Sanjram1,2,3,4,5, Yogesh Kumar Shivhare6
1Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, 226957Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, India.
Perceptual and Motor Skills
|August 18, 2021
Summary
Motor variability (MV) is predictive under short auditory-motor synchronization (AMS) intervals, regardless of tone frequency. However, under long intervals, low-frequency tones increase MV, suggesting suitability for auditory-motor learning.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Auditory Perception
Background:
- Motor variability (MV) is crucial for motor learning and adaptation in sensory-motor systems.
- Auditory-motor synchronization (AMS) involves synchronizing movements with auditory stimuli at specific inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs).
- Peri-second and supra-second ISIs are processed differently, with supra-second intervals demanding more cognitive resources and attention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of tone frequency on predictive tapping and motor variability (MV) within peri-second and supra-second inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs).
- To understand how different auditory stimulus properties affect motor responses during synchronization tasks.
Main Methods:
- Thirty healthy participants were divided into peri-second and supra-second ISI conditions.
- Participants performed predictive tapping tasks synchronized to isochronous sound sequences.
- Analysis included negative and positive asynchrony for tapping and coefficient of variation (CV) of inter-tap intervals (ITIs) for MV.
Main Results:
- Predictive tapping occurred under short ISIs, independent of tone frequency.
- Motor variability (MV) was not affected by tone frequency under short ISIs.
- Under long ISIs, low-frequency tones resulted in significantly higher MV compared to high-frequency tones.
Conclusions:
- Motor variability (MV) operates predictively under short inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) but reactively under long ISIs.
- Tone frequency significantly modulates MV in the supra-second range, with low frequencies increasing variability.
- Low-frequency tones are optimal for enhancing auditory-motor learning in the supra-second ISI range.

