Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
Published on: April 9, 2019
Empirical versus theoretical power and type I error (false-positive) rates estimated from real murine aging research
Irene Alfaras1, Keisuke Ejima2, Camila Vieira Ligo Teixeira1
1Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging Intramural Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Abstract:
We assess the degree of phenotypic variation in a cohort of 24-month-old male C57BL/6 mice. Because murine studies often use small sample sizes, if the commonly relied upon assumption of a normal distribution of residuals is not met, it may inflate type I error rates. In this study, 3-20 mice are resampled from the empirical distributions of 376 mice to create plasmodes, an approach for computing type I error rates and power for commonly used statistical tests without assuming a normal distribution of residuals. While all of the phenotypic and metabolic variables studied show considerable variability, the number of animals required to achieve adequate power is markedly different depending on the statistical test being performed. Overall, this work provides an analysis with which researchers can make informed decisions about the sample size required to achieve statistical power from specific measurements without a priori assumptions of a theoretical distribution.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...

