Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.1K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.3K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

134
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
134
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.9K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

361
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
361
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models01:21

Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models

207
Mechanistic models, a category encompassing both physiological and compartmental modeling, differ from empirical models' approaches to incorporating known factors about the systems being modeled. Empirical models describe data with minimal assumptions, while mechanistic models aim to provide a robust description of available data by specifying assumptions and integrating known factors about the system. Compartmental analysis is a key example of a mechanistic model in pharmacokinetics and...
207

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Double-decision Response Time Models of Recall and Recognition Support Resource Accounts of Visual Working Memory.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

Tracing the neural trajectories of evidence accumulation and motor preparation processes during voluntary decisions.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Evaluating malaria elimination strategies among military forces in Cambodia: a multi-arm clinical trial comparing monthly prophylaxis and focused screening and treatment.

BMC infectious diseases·2025
Same author

The interplay between selective attention and summary statistics.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

A selective sampling account of forming numerosity representations.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Using diffusion models for symbolic numeracy tasks to examine aging effects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling
06:55

Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling

Published on: August 5, 2016

8.3K

Modeling evidence accumulation decision processes using integral equations: Urgency-gating and collapsing boundaries.

Philip L Smith1, Roger Ratcliff2

  • 1Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne.

Psychological Review
|August 19, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Standard diffusion models accurately predict decision-making with constant stimuli. Time-varying models offer flexibility but don't fundamentally improve predictions for changing stimuli, challenging evidence accumulation theories.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.9K
Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling
06:55

Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling

Published on: August 5, 2016

8.3K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.9K
Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

20.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Decision-making research

Background:

  • Traditional diffusion models assume constant evidence accumulation rates and decision boundaries.
  • Recent research challenges these assumptions, proposing models with time-varying urgency or collapsing decision bounds.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive explicit mathematical expressions for urgency-gating and collapsing-bounds models.
  • To identify conditions for model equivalence and distinguish perceptual from decisional integration.
  • To compare these models against the standard diffusion model using experimental data.

Main Methods:

  • Developed integral-equation expressions for first-passage time distributions.
  • Integrated these with a dynamic stimulus encoding model.
  • Tested models on data from three paradigms with constant and changing stimulus information.

Main Results:

  • The standard diffusion model excelled in tasks with constant stimulus information.
  • Time-varying models showed comparable performance to the standard model in tasks with changing stimulus information.
  • Little support was found for models where evidence does not accumulate.

Conclusions:

  • The superior performance of time-varying models on changing-stimulus tasks is attributed to their increased flexibility.
  • The findings suggest that the standard diffusion model remains robust for many decision-making scenarios.
  • The study provides a framework for distinguishing perceptual and decisional processes in evidence accumulation.