Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

A Mouse Model of Orthopedic Surgery to Study Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Tissue Regeneration
Published on: February 27, 2018
Risk factors for postoperative delirium: An umbrella review of systematic reviews
P Bramley1, K McArthur2, A Blayney2
1Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Sheffield University, UK.
Background:
Postoperative delirium (POD) is associated with increased mortality, increased length of hospital stays and increased rates and severity of subsequent cognitive decline including dementia. A wide range of risk factors for POD have been suggested in the literature across multiple surgical specialities. However few are validated and no accurate prognostic models exist. We therefore aimed to map the existing evidence regarding risk factors for POD to help guide future research by undertaking an umbrella review of systematic reviews examining risk factors for POD in any context.
Materials And Methods:
We systematically searched multiple medical databases for systematic reviews examining the risk factors for POD in adults undergoing any surgery. We then selected relevant reviews with minimal overlap in primary studies and extracted information about individual risk factors.
Results:
Thirty-five relevant reviews were identified of which ten were in trauma and orthopaedic surgery patients (four exclusively examined hip fractures), five were in cardiac surgery patients, and four were in vascular surgery patients. Due to substantial overlap in reviews, eighteen reviews were analysed in detail finding the widely examined and consistent risk factors were increasing age, nursing home residency, pre-existing cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders, cerebrovascular disease, end stage renal failure, low albumin, higher ASA score, and intra-operative blood transfusion. Many other risk factors were examined, but they were either not studied in multiple systematic reviews, or inconsistent either in results or in categorisation (which for many factors was heterogenous even within systematic reviews). There are also a large number of existing prognostic models, many of which remain unvalidated.
Conclusion:
Given the wealth of existing literature, future research should avoid simple risk factor evaluation except for novel candidates, validate existing prognostic models where possible, and instead focus on interventional research.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...

