Variety of subphase emerging sequences, the frustration of three main phases, SmC_{A}^{*}, SmC^{*}, and SmA, and the...

Prompted by the existence of biaxial subphases 1/4, 2/5, and 3/7 [Phys. Rev. E 96, 012701 (2017)2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.96.012701], we reconsidered the three-phase frustration and the resulting degeneracy lifting by combining the phase diagram of SmC_{A}^{*}, SmC^{*}, and SmA with the discrete flexoelectric effect. We systematically calculated the phase diagrams and tried to understand the overall picture of the phenomena by means of a simple and intuitively clear way in terms of minimal number of parameters. The treatment naturally explains the highly distorted helical structures of the biaxial subphases as well as the microscopic helical short-pitch of SmC_{α}^{*} which increases or decreases accordingly with rising temperature. The regular subphase emerging sequence is SmC_{A}^{*}(SmC_{α}^{*})-1/4-1/3-2/5-3/7-1/2-SmC^{*}(SmC_{α}^{*}), where the subphases other than 1/3 and 1/2 may or may not emerge. At the same time, we can see a variety of irregular sequences; in particular, any one of the biaxial subphases may singly emerge between SmC_{A}^{*}(SmC_{α}^{*}) and (SmC^{*})SmC_{α}^{*}. Moreover, the experimentally confirmed extraordinary subphase emerging sequence SmC^{*}-1/2-SmC_{α}^{*} appears for particular parameter values. Contrastingly to these affirmative aspects, some calculated results are contradictory to the previously reported experimental results: the change from SmC_{A}^{*} and SmC^{*} to SmC_{α}^{*} is always continuous, the 6-layer 2/3 subphase is not stabilized, and the subphase emerging sequence SmC_{A}^{*}-1/3-SmC^{*} does not appear. The causes of inconsistency and how to resolve them were discussed in comparisons with experimental findings.