Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...

The Nativist Approach

The Nativist Approach

The nativist approach to infant cognitive development proposes that infants are born with inherent knowledge structures that allow them to interpret the world almost immediately. This perspective contrasts with earlier developmental theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget, which emphasized a more gradual acquisition of cognitive abilities through interaction with the environment. One key concept in this approach is object permanence — the understanding that objects continue to...

Cognitivism

Cognitivism

Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...

Conformity

Conformity

Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same journal

Can Evidential Pluralism mitigate bias and motivated reasoning?

Synthese·2026

Same journal

AI-assisted rational decision-making.

Synthese·2026

Same journal

Technological Understanding: On the cognitive skill involved in the design and use of technological artefacts.

Synthese·2026

Same journal

Addictive Motivational Scaffolds and the Structure of Social Media.

Synthese·2026

Same journal

When do we experience effort?

Synthese·2026

Same journal

Prescriptive 'selves' and self-illness ambiguity.

Synthese·2025

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

The knowledge norm of assertion: keep it simple.

¹University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

|August 20, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The simple knowledge norm of assertion (SKNA) is defended, arguing that asserting requires knowledge but not necessarily asserting on the basis of knowledge. This challenges the express knowledge norm of assertion (EKNA).

Keywords:

Epistemic blame Express knowledge norm of assertion Moral worth Norm of assertion Rightly/well distinction

More Related Videos

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

Area of Science:

Epistemology
Philosophy of Language

Background:

The simple knowledge norm of assertion (SKNA) posits that assertion requires knowledge.
Alternative views, like the express knowledge norm of assertion (EKNA), require assertions to be based on knowledge.

Purpose of the Study:

To defend SKNA against EKNA.
To critique EKNA by presenting counterexamples and challenging its underlying assumptions about permissibility.

Main Methods:

Philosophical argumentation
Analysis of normative concepts (permissibility, acting rightly, acting well)
Examination of counterexamples to EKNA

Main Results:

EKNA faces counterexamples.
EKNA relies on an implausible view of permissibility, conflating "rightly" with "well."
SKNA can account for the defectiveness of assertions made on poor epistemic grounds without requiring assertions to be based on knowledge.

Conclusions:

SKNA is a more plausible norm for assertion than EKNA.
Assertions made without the right reasons, even if known, can be epistemically blameworthy, not impermissible.
The debate highlights distinctions between permissibility and the quality of reasons for action.