Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

06:18
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.3K
A New Consensus Model Based on Trust Interactive Weights for Intuitionistic Group Decision Making in Social Networks.
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
|August 20, 2021
Summary
This study introduces a novel trust-induced consensus process for group decision making (GDM). It accounts for expert interactions, improving decision accuracy by decomposing weights into individual and interactive components.
Area of Science:
- Decision Sciences
- Artificial Intelligence
- Fuzzy Logic
Background:
- Conventional group decision making (GDM) often assumes independent experts, neglecting crucial interpersonal interactions.
- Expert opinions and influence can be significantly affected by communication, collaboration, and trust within a group.
- Efficient information transmission relies on trusted communication channels, a factor often overlooked in GDM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an optimal trust-induced consensus process for GDM that incorporates expert interactions.
- To decompose expert weights into individual and interactive components to better reflect real-world dynamics.
- To enhance GDM by utilizing intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and trust mechanisms.
Main Methods:
- Decomposition of expert weights into individual and interactive components.
- Construction of three optimization models for weight parameters using 2-order additive fuzzy measures and Shapley values.
- Application of the Choquet integral for opinion aggregation and a novel distance measure for consensus index calculation.
Main Results:
- A new method for calculating comprehensive expert weights that includes interactive effects.
- An effective trust-induced consensus process that improves upon traditional GDM approaches.
- Demonstrated effectiveness and improvements through an illustrative example and comparative analysis.
Conclusions:
- The proposed trust-induced consensus process effectively models expert interactions in GDM.
- Incorporating trust and interaction significantly enhances the consensus-building process.
- The method offers a more realistic and improved approach to GDM compared to conventional techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
29.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
29.7K
Reason and Intuition
7.1K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.3K
Social Exchange Theory
36.9K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
36.9K
The Representativeness Heuristic
16.4K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.4K
Implicit Personality Theories
74
Implicit personality theory explains how individuals make assumptions about the relationships between personality traits, behaviors, and character types. When people learn that someone possesses a particular trait, they tend to infer the presence of other related characteristics, forming a cohesive impression. This cognitive shortcut plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal judgments.Central Traits and Their InfluenceSolomon Asch's seminal 1946 study highlighted the power...
74

