Is Peer assisted learning better? A modern question to answer: A comparative study

Area of Science:

• Medical Education
• Pedagogy in Higher Education

Background:

• Medical students' learning can be enhanced through various pedagogical approaches.
• Peer-assisted learning (PAL) offers a collaborative learning environment.
• Comparing PAL with traditional expert-led instruction is essential for curriculum development.

Purpose of the Study:

• To evaluate the academic performance of medical students under peer-assisted learning versus expert-assisted learning.
• To explore student perceptions regarding the efficacy and role of peer-assisted learning in medical training.

Main Methods:

• A mixed-method study involving fourth-year medical students randomized into two groups.
• Rotational teaching sessions on 'Data' and 'Sampling' using either peer or expert instructors.
• Post-session assessments and predesigned questionnaires to gather student feedback on peer-assisted learning.

Main Results:

• No significant difference in scores during the first session (p>0.05).
• A statistically significant difference in scores during the second session, favoring expert-led instruction (p=0.005).
• Qualitative data provided insights into student experiences and the perceived value of peer versus expert roles.

Conclusions:

• Peer-assisted learning is a beneficial supplement for teaching less complex topics in medical curricula.
• Expert instruction remains indispensable for providing essential guidance and feedback in medical education.
• Integrating PAL requires careful consideration of topic complexity and the continued importance of expert educators.