Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Controlling Parkinson's Disease With Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation
Published on: July 16, 2014
Using computerized spiral analysis to evaluate deep brain stimulation outcomes in Parkinson disease
Sara Radmard1, Roberto A Ortega2, Blair Ford1
1Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Objective:
To determine whether spiral analysis can monitor the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson disease (PD) and provide a window on clinical features that change post-operatively. Clinical evaluation after DBS is subjective and insensitive to small changes. Spiral analysis is a computerized test that quantifies kinematic, dynamic, and spatial aspects of spiral drawing. Validated computational indices are generated and correlate with a range of clinically relevant motor findings. These include measures of overall clinical severity (Severity), bradykinesia and rigidity (Smoothness), amount of tremor (Tremor), irregularity of drawing movements (Variability), and micrographia (Tightness).
Methods:
We retrospectively evaluated the effect of subthalamic nucleus (STN) (n = 66) and ventral intermediate thalamus (Vim) (n = 10) DBS on spiral drawing in PD subjects using spiral analysis. Subjects freely drew ten spirals on plain paper with an inking pen on a graphics tablet. Five spiral indices (Severity, Smoothness, Tremor, Variability, Tightness) were calculated and compared pre- and post-operatively using Wilcoxon-rank sum tests, adjusting for multiple comparisons.
Results:
Severity improved after STN and Vim DBS (p < 0.005). Smoothness (p < 0.01) and Tremor (p < 0.02) both improved after STN and Vim DBS. Variability improved only with Vim DBS. Neither STN nor Vim DBS significantly changed Tightness.
Conclusions:
All major spiral indices, except Tightness, improved after DBS. This suggests spiral analysis monitors DBS effects in PD and provides an objective window on relevant clinical features that change post-operatively. It may thus have utilization in clinical trials or investigations into the neural pathways altered by DBS. The lack of change in Tightness supports the notion that DBS does not improve micrographia.
More Related Videos
07:14A Novel Approach to Assess Motor Outcome of Deep Brain Stimulation Effects in the Hemiparkinsonian Rat: Staircase and Cylinder Test
Published on: May 31, 2016
14:14Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
Published on: August 12, 2018