Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

271
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
271
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

13.5K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.5K
Dark Triad and Person Perception01:29

Dark Triad and Person Perception

44
Person perception is influenced by both external behaviors and the observer’s internal characteristics, including personality traits. Individuals with dark personality traits, comprising psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism — collectively known as the dark triad – exhibit manipulative and exploitative tendencies in social contexts. These traits affect how they perceive others and how they are perceived.The Role of Dark Personality Traits in Person PerceptionBlack et...
44
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.3K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.3K
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other01:20

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

48
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...
48
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A reporting checklist for large language models in behavioural science.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Liberals and Conservatives See Different Victims: Moral Disagreement Is Explained by Different Assumptions of Vulnerability.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

The Bots Ruining Social Science Are Not Bots at All.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Health Behaviors Are Moralized When Perceived to Cause Harm.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025
Same author

Intraguild predation among snails drives human schistosome amplification despite susceptible host regulation.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

A large-scale investigation of everyday moral dilemmas.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same journal

Collective memory and historical thinking in times of uncertainty.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Does behavioral parent training benefit from cultural adaptations? A critical analysis.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Politics in psychiatry and psychotherapis in Japan with personal reflection; Is cognitive behavior therapy non-political?

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Antisemitism in professional clinical psychology training.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

The decolonization of museums.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Contemporary antisemitism: Implications for cognitive behavioral therapy.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 23, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.7K

Deconstructing moral character judgments.

Rachel Hartman1, Will Blakey1, Kurt Gray1

  • 1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

Current Opinion in Psychology
|August 21, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People judge others' moral character based on behavior, mind, and identity. These judgments form a space with heroes, villains, and victims, offering a nuanced view beyond simple good vs. evil.

Keywords:
AgencyDyadic moralityMind perceptionMoralitySocial identity

More Related Videos

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
07:56

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure

Published on: September 19, 2019

10.2K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 23, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.7K
Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
07:56

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure

Published on: September 19, 2019

10.2K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Cognition
  • Moral Psychology

Background:

  • Individuals frequently assess others' moral character, an internal quality believed to forecast future actions.
  • Understanding the basis of these judgments is crucial for social interaction and ethical considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define moral character and elucidate the psychological drivers behind character judgments.
  • To present a comprehensive taxonomy of perceived moral character types.
  • To map character judgments within a theoretical framework.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis and theoretical integration of existing research on moral judgment.
  • Development of a taxonomy and a dimensional model of moral character perception.
  • Exploration of key elements influencing judgments: behavior, mind, and identity.

Main Results:

  • Moral character judgments are driven by assessments of behavior (actions), mind (intentions, capacities), and identity (group affiliations, appearance).
  • A two-dimensional triangular space (valence and agency) models character judgments, identifying heroes, villains, and victims as core archetypes.
  • A nuanced taxonomy of moral character types is proposed, extending beyond a binary good/evil dichotomy.

Conclusions:

  • Moral character perception is a complex process influenced by multiple factors, including observable actions, inferred mental states, and social identity cues.
  • The proposed model provides a structured understanding of the diverse ways individuals are perceived morally.
  • This framework advances the study of social cognition and moral psychology by offering a richer account of character evaluation.