Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood
Published on: February 11, 2017
Are our samples representative? Understanding whether temperament influences infant dropout rates at 3 and 7 months
Shira C Segal1, Alexandra R Marquis1, Margaret C Moulson1
1Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 2K3, Canada.
Insights
Infant temperament did not predict study dropout at 3.5 or 7 months. Study dropout was also inconsistent across different experimental tasks and time points, suggesting temperament is not a reliable predictor of participation in infant research.
Area of Science:
- Developmental psychology
- Infant research methodology
Background:
- Understanding factors influencing participation in longitudinal infant studies is crucial for data integrity.
- Study dropout, or attrition, can bias findings and limit generalizability.
- Infant temperament is a key individual difference that may affect engagement and persistence in research tasks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if infant temperament predicts study dropout at 3.5 and 7 months of age.
- To determine the temporal stability of study dropout across different time points.
- To assess the consistency of study dropout across diverse experimental tasks.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal study design tracking infant participation.
- Measurement of infant temperament using standardized assessments.
- Assessment of study dropout across four distinct experimental tasks: free-play, electroencephalography (EEG) event-related potentials (ERP), still-face paradigm, and eye tracking.
- Analysis of dropout rates at 3.5 and 7 months.
Main Results:
- Infant temperament was not found to be a significant predictor of study dropout at either 3.5 or 7 months.
- Study dropout exhibited instability across different time points.
- Dropout rates were not consistent across the four experimental tasks, indicating task-specific attrition.
Conclusions:
- Individual differences in infant temperament do not appear to systematically influence study completion in infant research.
- The inconsistency of dropout across tasks and time suggests that attrition is not a fixed characteristic of participants.
- These findings support the potential utility of multi-study data collection approaches in infant research to mitigate the impact of task-specific dropout.
Abstract:
In this study, we examined whether infant temperament predicted study dropout at 3.5 and 7 months and whether dropout was stable across time. Dropout was measured across four experimental tasks (free-play, ERP, still-face, and eye tracking). Temperament was not related to dropout at either timepoint. Dropout was not stable across time, nor was it stable across tasks. These findings suggest that individual differences in temperament are not systematically related to study completion across experimental tasks with varied requirements. These findings additionally suggest that dropout is not consistent across tasks, which may support the utility of multi-study data collection methods.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Regression Toward the Mean
Relationship with Parents: Attachment
Attachment
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Parenting Styles
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...

