Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Determining the Contribution of the Energy Systems During Exercise
Published on: March 20, 2012
Anaerobic Capacity in Running: The Effect of Computational Method
Erik P Andersson1,2, Glenn Björklund1, Kerry McGawley1
1Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
Introduction:
To date, no study has compared anaerobic capacity (AnC) estimates computed with the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD) method and the gross energy cost (GEC) method applied to treadmill running exercise.
Purpose:
Four different models for estimating anaerobic energy supply during treadmill running exercise were compared.
Methods:
Fifteen endurance-trained recreational athletes performed, after a 10-min warm-up, five 4-min stages at ∼55-80% of peak oxygen uptake, and a 4-min time trial (TT). Two linear speed-metabolic rate (MR) regression models were used to estimate the instantaneous required MR during the TT (MR ), either including (5+Y ) or excluding (5-Y ) a measured Y-intercept. Also, the average GEC (GEC ) based on all five submaximal stages, or the GEC based on the last submaximal stage (GEC ), were used as models to estimate the instantaneous MR . The AnC was computed as the difference between the MR and the aerobic MR integrated over time.
Results:
The GEC remained constant at ∼4.39 ± 0.29 J⋅kg-1⋅m-1 across the five submaximal stages and the TT was performed at a speed of 4.7 ± 0.4 m⋅s-1. Compared with the 5-Y , GEC , and GEC models, the 5+Y model generated a MR that was ∼3.9% lower, with corresponding anaerobic capacities from the four models of 0.72 ± 0.20, 0.74 ± 0.16, 0.74 ± 0.15, and 0.54 ± 0.14 kJ⋅kg-1, respectively (F 1.07,42 = 13.9, P = 0.002). The GEC values associated with the TT were 4.22 ± 0.27 and 4.37 ± 0.30 J⋅kg-1⋅m-1 for 5+Y and 5-Y , respectively (calculated from the regression equation), and 4.39 ± 0.28 and 4.38 ± 0.27 J⋅kg-1⋅m-1 for GEC and GEC , respectively (F 1.08,42 = 14.6, P < 0.001). The absolute typical errors in AnC ranged between 0.03 and 0.16 kJ⋅kg-1 for the six pair-wise comparisons and the overall standard error of measurement (SEM) was 0.16 kJ⋅kg-1.
Conclusion:
These findings demonstrate a generally high disagreement in estimated anaerobic capacities between models and show that the inclusion of a measured Y-intercept in the linear regression (i.e., 5+Y ) is likely to underestimate the MR and the GEC associated with the TT, and hence the AnC during maximal 4-min treadmill running.
Related Concept Videos
Muscle Recovery and Fatigue
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be...
Cellular Respiration

