Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Association between individual surgeon volume and outcome in mitral valve surgery: a systematic review
Berdel Akmaz1,2, Sander M J van Kuijk3, Peyman Sardari Nia2
1Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Background:
Surgeon volume has been identified as a possible factor that influences outcomes in mitral valve (MV) surgery. The aim of this study was to systematically review all published studies on the association between individual surgeon volume and outcome in MV surgery.
Methods:
PubMed was searched last on 19 November 2020. The reporting of this systematic review was done in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Manuscripts were eligible when these studied individual surgeon volumes and its association with repair rate, mortality or reoperation. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Absolute numbers and percentages of the outcome measures, odds ratios (ORs), P values and threshold values regarding surgeon volume were collected.
Results:
A total of 7 retrospective cohort studies were included in the qualitative analysis with total of 158488 patients. Definitions of surgeon volumes were found to be heterogenic and therefore pooling of data was not possible. Surgeon volume was significantly associated with repair rate (OR =1.25-5.5) and mortality (OR =0.46-0.84 and OR =1.50-2.27 depending on the reference group). Regarding reoperation, results were not consistent and did not always show a significant lower reoperation rate when surgeon volume increased. A mean threshold of minimally 30 MV surgeries per year was found.
Discussion:
Higher surgeon volume is significantly associated with improved outcomes of repair rate and mortality. MV should preferentially be performed by high-volume surgeons and centralization of MV surgery might be necessary.
Insights
High-volume mitral valve (MV) surgeons achieve better repair rates and lower mortality. Centralizing MV surgery may improve patient outcomes by ensuring procedures are performed by experienced, high-volume surgeons.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Surgeon volume is a potential determinant of patient outcomes in mitral valve (MV) surgery.
- Existing literature suggests a link between surgeon experience and surgical success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review published studies investigating the association between individual surgeon volume and outcomes in MV surgery.
- To assess the impact of surgeon experience on mitral valve repair rates, mortality, and reoperation rates.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed up to November 19, 2020.
- Seven retrospective cohort studies, totaling 158,488 patients, were included in the qualitative analysis.
- Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
Main Results:
- Heterogeneous definitions of surgeon volume precluded data pooling.
- Higher surgeon volume was significantly associated with improved mitral valve repair rates (OR = 1.25-5.5) and mortality (OR = 0.46-0.84).
- Results for reoperation rates were inconsistent; a mean threshold of 30 MV surgeries per year was identified.
Conclusions:
- Increased surgeon volume correlates with superior mitral valve repair rates and reduced mortality.
- Mitral valve surgery should ideally be performed by high-volume surgeons.
- Centralization of mitral valve surgery may be a necessary strategy to improve patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction

