Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025
In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
Interobserver reliability is higher for assessments with 3D software-generated models than with conventional MRI
Andreas Fuchs1, Matthias J Feucht2, Jörg Dickschas3
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. andreas.fuchs@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Purpose:
Trochlear dysplasia is a significant risk factor for patellofemoral instability. The severity of trochlear dysplasia is commonly evaluated based on the Dejour classification in axial MRI slices. However, this often leads to heterogeneous assessments. A software to generate MRI-based 3D models of the knee was developed to ensure more standardized visualization of knee structures. The purpose of this study was to assess the intra- and interobserver agreements of 2D axial MRI slices and an MRI-based 3D software generated model in classification of trochlear dysplasia as described by Dejour.
Methods:
Four investigators independently assessed 38 axial MRI scans for trochlear dysplasia. Analysis was made according to Dejour's 4 grade classification as well as differentiating between 2 grades: low-grade (types A + B) and high-grade trochlear dysplasia (types C + D). Assessments were repeated following a one-week interval. The inter- and intraobserver agreement was determined using Cohen's kappa (κ) and Fleiss kappa statistic (κ). In addition, the proportion of observed agreement (po) was calculated for assessment of intraobserver agreement.
Results:
The assessment of the intraobserver reliability with regard to the Dejour-classification showed moderate agreement values both in the 2D (κ = 0.59 ± 0.08 SD) and in the 3D analysis (κ = 0.57 ± 0.08 SD). Considering the 2-grade classification, the 2D (κ = 0.62 ± 0.12 SD) and 3D analysis (κ = 0.61 ± 0.19 SD) each showed good intraobserver matches. The analysis of the interobserver reliability also showed moderate agreement values with differences in the subgroups (2D vs. 3D). The 2D evaluation showed correspondences of κ = 0.48 (Dejour) and κ = 0.46 (high / low). In the assessment based on the 3D models, correspondence values of κ = 0.53 (Dejour) and κ = 0.59 (high / low) were documented.
Conclusion:
Overall, moderate-to-good agreement values were found in all groups. The analysis of the intraobserver reliability showed no relevant differences between 2 and 3D representation, but better agreement values were found in the 2-degree classification. In the analysis of interobserver reliability, better agreement values were found in the 3D compared to the 2D representation. The clinical relevance of this study lies in the superiority of the 3D representation in the assessment of trochlear dysplasia, which is relevant for future analytical procedures as well as surgical planning.
Level Of Evidence:
Level II.
