Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
US Velocimetry in Participants with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease
Stefan Engelhard1, Majorie van Helvert1, Jason Voorneveld1
1From the Department of Vascular Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD Arnhem, the Netherlands (S.E., M.v.H., E.G.J., M.M.P.J.R.); Multi-modality Medical Imaging Group (S.E., M.v.H., E.G.J., M.M.P.J.R.) and Physics of Fluids Group (S.E., M.v.H., G.P.R.L., M.V.), Technical Medical (TechMed) Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (J.V., J.G.B.).
Abstract:
Background The accurate quantification of blood flow in aortoiliac arteries is challenging but clinically relevant because local flow patterns can influence atherosclerotic disease. Purpose To investigate the feasibility and clinical application of two-dimensional blood flow quantification using high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US (HFR-CEUS) and particle image velocimetry (PIV), or US velocimetry, in participants with aortoiliac stenosis. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, participants with a recently diagnosed aortoiliac stenosis underwent HFR-CEUS measurements of the pre- and poststenotic vessel segments (August 2018 to July 2019). Two-dimensional quantification of blood flow was achieved by performing PIV analysis, which was based on pairwise cross-correlation of the HFR-CEUS images. Visual inspection of the entire data set was performed by five observers to evaluate the ability of the technique to enable adequate visualization of blood flow. The contrast-to-background ratio and average vector correlation were calculated. In two participants who showed flow disturbances, the flow complexity and vorticity were calculated. Results Thirty-five participants (median age, 67 years; age range, 56-84 years; 22 men) were included. Visual scoring showed that flow quantification was achieved in 41 of 42 locations. In 25 locations, one or multiple issues occurred that limited optimal flow quantification, including loss of correlation during systole (n = 12), shadow regions (n = 8), a short vessel segment in the image plane (n = 7), and loss of contrast during diastole (n = 5). In the remaining 16 locations, optimal quantification was achieved. The contrast-to-background ratio was higher during systole than during diastole (11.0 ± 2.9 vs 6.9 ± 3.4, respectively; P < .001), whereas the vector correlation was lower (0.58 ± 0.21 vs 0.47 ± 0.13; P < .001). The flow complexity and vorticity were high in regions with disturbed flow. Conclusion Blood flow quantification with US velocimetry is feasible in patients with an aortoiliac stenosis, but several challenges must be overcome before implementation into clinical practice. Clinical trial registration no. NTR6980 © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...

