Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Expectations of trustworthiness in cross-status interactions
Mauricio Salgado1, Javier Núñez2, Bernardo Mackenna3
1School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Av. República 252, Santiago, Chile.
Social status influences generalized trust, but not directly trusting strangers in economic games. Income is key, with lower-status individuals showing more trust towards similar status groups.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Sociology
Background:
- Trust is fundamental in social interactions, yet factors influencing trust in unknown individuals, especially across different social statuses, remain underexplored.
- Existing research on trust often originates from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies, limiting generalizability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of social standing on the trustworthiness perceptions of strangers in cross-status interactions.
- To examine the role of income and social status in trust decisions within a high-inequality, socially segregated context.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a vignette version of the trust game to simulate economic interactions between individuals of varying social statuses.
- Collected data in Chile, a non-WEIRD context characterized by significant social stratification and segregation.
Main Results:
- A positive correlation was observed between social status and generalized trust, but social status did not predict trusting behavior in the trust game.
- Trustor's perception of the trustee's income was the most significant factor influencing trust decisions.
- Higher-income individuals were generally less trusted, particularly by lower-status trustors.
- Lower-status participants exhibited increased trust towards individuals of similar social standing, a pattern not observed in higher-status participants.
Conclusions:
- Social standing has a complex relationship with trust, impacting generalized trust but not directly dictating trusting behavior towards strangers in economic exchanges.
- Income serves as a critical cue for trustworthiness, with lower-status individuals demonstrating more particularized trust within their social strata.
- Findings highlight the importance of context, particularly social inequality and segregation, in shaping trust dynamics and the manifestation of ingroup favoritism.
More Related Videos
11:13The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
07:34Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies