Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice
Published on: November 22, 2024
Empathy and Schadenfreude in Human-Robot Teams
Dorina de Jong1,2,3, Ruud Hortensius1,4, Te-Yi Hsieh1
1Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
People show intergroup biases, like empathy and schadenfreude, towards both humans and robots. Team identification strengthens these biases, influencing human-robot interactions.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Human-Robot Interaction
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Intergroup dynamics significantly influence social interactions, leading to biases such as empathy towards ingroup members and schadenfreude (pleasure from outgroup misfortune).
- Understanding if these biases extend to interactions with non-human agents like robots is crucial for the future of human-robot collaboration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the presence and extent of intergroup biases (empathy and schadenfreude) in human-robot interactions.
- To compare these biases in human-human versus human-robot teams.
- To examine the influence of robot's human likeness and team identification on these biases.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments involving 361 participants assessed emotional reactivity during a competitive reaction time game.
- Empathy and schadenfreude were measured by analyzing participants' responses to ingroup and outgroup team members' outcomes.
- Robot's human likeness was varied (humanoid vs. mechanoid), and team identification levels were recorded.
Main Results:
- A consistent intergroup bias was observed, with participants showing more empathy towards ingroup members and more schadenfreude towards outgroup members.
- These biases were present regardless of whether the team member was human or robot, with no significant difference in reported empathy or schadenfreude.
- The human likeness of the robot did not consistently affect the intergroup bias.
- Higher levels of team identification correlated with stronger intergroup empathy and schadenfreude biases.
Conclusions:
- Intergroup biases observed in human-human interactions are replicated in human-robot interactions, indicating a fundamental aspect of social cognition.
- The nature of the agent (human vs. robot) does not eliminate these biases, suggesting that team membership is a primary driver.
- Team identification plays a significant role in modulating these biases, highlighting its importance in social dynamics involving robots.
More Related Videos
07:34Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
05:21Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
Published on: January 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Empathy
Stereotype Content Model
Egoism and Altruism
Robbers Cave
Nonconscious Mimicry
Altruism