Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Dynamic frontal crash performance of old and used child restraint systems
Tom Whyte1,2,3, Nicholas Kent1, Michael Griffiths4
1Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Insights
Child restraint systems aged over 10 years show minimal degradation in dynamic performance during simulated frontal crashes. While older restraints offer protection, newer models may provide enhanced safety due to design improvements.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Materials Science
- Automotive Safety
Background:
- Child restraint systems (CRS) are crucial for protecting children in vehicle crashes.
- The long-term effects of aging on CRS performance are not fully understood.
- Understanding degradation is vital for establishing safe usage guidelines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of age on the dynamic performance of child restraint systems in frontal impacts.
- To determine if older or used child restraints maintain their protective capabilities.
- To analyze the relationship between restraint age and potential damage or performance degradation.
Main Methods:
- Simulated frontal crashes (over 56 km/h, ~33g deceleration) using a deceleration sled.
- Tested both used (3-269 months) and new child restraints.
- Utilized Q1 and Q6 Anthropometric Test Devices (ATDs) to measure head/chest responses and head excursions.
- Monitored restraints for damage before and after impacts.
Main Results:
- All tested restraints, regardless of age, kept the ATD within the system during impacts.
- No significant correlation found between ATD responses and restraint age.
- Older forward-facing restraints showed a minor increase in head excursion (0.27 mm/month).
- A slight increase in the likelihood of critical damage was observed with restraint age.
Conclusions:
- Degradation in dynamic performance for older child restraints is minimal, even beyond the recommended 10-year lifespan.
- Newer restraints may offer superior protection due to incremental design enhancements.
- Confirms that child restraints should never be reused after a crash involvement.
Objective:
To examine the effect of age on the dynamic performance of child restraint systems in frontal crashes.
Methods:
A sample of used (3-269 months from manufacture) and newly purchased child restraints were subjected to frontal crash simulations of more than 56 km/h and peak deceleration approximately 33 g on a deceleration sled. Restraints were monitored for evidence of damage before and after each impact. Anthropometric test device (ATD) head and chest responses and peak head excursions were recorded for rearward facing restraints using the Q1 ATD and for forward facing restraints and booster seats using the Q6 ATD. The influence of restraint age on peak 3 ms head acceleration, HIC15, head excursion, peak 3 ms chest acceleration and restraint damage were analyzed.
Results:
In all impacts, the ATD remained within the restraint and secured to the test bench demonstrating the crash protection offered by the old and used restraints. There was no apparent relationship between ATD responses and restraint age for any restraint type. Older forward facing restraint systems had a very modest increase in forward head excursion (R2 = 0.59, p = 0.001) of 0.27 mm for each month of age (95% CI, 0.13 mm - 0.42 mm). This equates to a 0.7% increase in the minimum measured excursion per year of restraint age. There was also a small increased likelihood of critical damage to the restraints in the simulated crashes per month of restraint age (OR 1.031, 95% CI 1.010-1.069).
Conclusions:
Overall, degradation in restraint dynamic performance in older restraints, including some that are much older than the currently recommended 10-year lifetime, is minimal. However newer restraints may provide better protection due to marginal improvements in restraint design over time. Furthermore, the results of this study confirm previous recommendations that restraints should not be re-used after crash involvement.
Related Concept Videos
Impulse
Additionally, it can be shown that the...
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Elastic Collisions: Case Study

