Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hand hygiene01:23

Hand hygiene

4.7K
Asepsis is the practice of preventing or breaking the chain of infection. The nurse employs aseptic techniques to prevent the spread of microorganisms and reduce the risk of diseases. Hand hygiene is the cornerstone of aseptic techniques and is classified into medical and surgical asepsis. Medical asepsis includes hand hygiene and the use of gloves. Surgical asepsis, or the sterile technique, refers to practices that render and keep objects and areas free of microorganisms.
Hand washing...
4.7K
Handwashing III: During the Procedure and Post-Procedure Steps01:15

Handwashing III: During the Procedure and Post-Procedure Steps

1.9K
To wash hands properly, follow these steps:
1.9K
Handwashing II: Pre-procedure and Initial Procedure Steps01:19

Handwashing II: Pre-procedure and Initial Procedure Steps

1.2K
The pre-procedure steps of handwashing include removing jewelry and rolling up sleeves. However, many organizations allow staff to wear wedding rings.
The hand washing procedure itself includes the following steps. First, cover cuts, if any, on hands with a waterproof dressing. Cuts and abrasions can become contaminated with bacteria hindering the ability to clean the area thoroughly. In addition, repeated hand washing can worsen an injury.  The nails must be short and clean, without nail...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Expanding Technology-Enabled, Nurse-Delivered Chronic Disease Care : A Pragmatic, Randomized, Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Reducing Respiratory Device-Related Pressure Injuries in High-Acuity Patients: A Quality Improvement Project.

Critical care nurse·2026
Same author

Impact of a patient-facing video on CHG bathing compliance in patients admitted to a bone marrow transplant unit.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same author

Evaluation Methods for Evidence-Based Practice Quality Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Policy Analysis Initiatives.

Journal of nursing care quality·2026
Same author

Misalignment between research and quality improvement terminology in published nursing reports: A descriptive study.

Nursing outlook·2026
Same author

Support for the Article "Misplaced Protections: How IRB Review Is the Wrong Gatekeeper for EBP Initiatives".

Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 23, 2025

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
09:02

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens

Published on: June 7, 2017

19.4K

Self-Reported versus observed audit: Measuring CHG bathing compliance.

Staci S Reynolds1, Bradi B Granger2, Daniel Hatch2

  • 1Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC; Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC.

American Journal of Infection Control
|August 25, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Self-reported data may accurately measure chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing compliance. This study found no significant difference between observed and self-reported CHG bathing audits, suggesting self-reporting is a viable alternative.

Keywords:
BathingChlorhexidine gluconateCompliance

More Related Videos

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

13.1K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 23, 2025

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
09:02

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens

Published on: June 7, 2017

19.4K
Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

13.1K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare-associated infection prevention
  • Clinical practice auditing
  • Patient safety protocols

Background:

  • Direct observation audits are crucial for monitoring chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing compliance.
  • Challenges exist in efficiently collecting data through direct observation.
  • Accurate compliance measurement is vital for infection control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare observed CHG bathing compliance with self-reported compliance.
  • To evaluate the feasibility of using self-reported data as a proxy measure.
  • To identify potential methods for simplifying compliance data collection.

Main Methods:

  • Direct observation audits of the CHG bathing process were conducted.
  • Self-reported compliance data for the CHG bathing process was collected.
  • Statistical analysis was performed to compare observed and self-reported compliance rates.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference was found between observed and self-reported CHG bathing compliance (p = .06).
  • Self-reported compliance appears to be a reliable indicator of actual adherence.
  • The findings suggest self-reporting is an accessible method for data capture.

Conclusions:

  • Self-reported compliance may serve as an accurate and practical proxy for measuring CHG bathing adherence.
  • This finding offers a potentially simpler method for auditing CHG bathing practices.
  • Implementing self-reporting could improve the sustainability of monitoring CHG bathing compliance.