Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

A 3D Organotypic Melanoma Spheroid Skin Model
Published on: May 18, 2018
Metastatic acral melanoma treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Kenneth K Cho1,2, Anne E Cust3,4, Yun Megan Foo2
1Department of Surgery, The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Penrith.
Abstract:
Acral melanomas are a unique subset of melanomas occurring on the palms, soles, and nails. There is poor prognosis with surgery alone and no specific guidelines for the treatment of metastatic acral melanoma. This meta-analysis explored the systemic therapy outcomes for metastatic acral melanoma. Medline, Pubmed, EMBASE, and the grey literature were searched from 2010 to August 2020 for studies specifying the treatment outcome of metastatic acral melanoma. Studies were assessed by two investigators. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed and pooled Kaplan-Meier curves for progression-free survival and overall survival were created. Critical appraisal was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Nineteen nonrandomized studies were included, comprising 646 patients with acral melanomas and 1609 patients with nonacral melanomas treated with systemic therapy including chemotherapy, KIT-targeted drugs, as well as anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Thirteen studies included Kaplan-Meier curves for progression-free survival or overall survival and 11 studies reported treatment responses. Patients with acral melanomas had worse prognosis than nonacral cutaneous melanoma (acral overall survival: median 15 months, 95% CI, 13.7-16.3 months; nonacral cutaneous: median 24 months, 95% CI, 22.6-25.4 months, P < 0.001). Acral melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy had higher overall survival at 12 months (53%) compared with anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy (34%; P < 0.001). This study provides estimates of treatment response for metastatic acral melanoma, demonstrating low activity across a breadth of approved drug therapies, including anti-PD-1, the most active therapy in melanoma to date. Further research into treatments for metastatic acral melanoma is needed.
Insights
Metastatic acral melanoma has a poor prognosis. Systemic therapies, including anti-PD-1, show limited effectiveness, highlighting the need for novel treatments for this rare cancer.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Dermatology
- Medical Research
Background:
- Acral melanomas, found on palms, soles, and nails, present unique challenges.
- Metastatic acral melanoma has a poor prognosis, with limited established treatment guidelines.
- Surgery alone offers insufficient outcomes for advanced acral melanoma.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of systemic therapies in patients with metastatic acral melanoma.
- To compare treatment outcomes between acral and nonacral melanomas.
- To identify the most effective current systemic treatments for acral melanoma.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search of Medline, Pubmed, EMBASE, and grey literature from 2010 to August 2020.
- Inclusion of 19 nonrandomized studies involving 646 acral melanoma patients and 1609 nonacral melanoma patients.
- Random-effects meta-analysis and creation of pooled Kaplan-Meier curves for survival outcomes.
Main Results:
- Acral melanoma patients exhibited a worse prognosis compared to nonacral cutaneous melanoma.
- Anti-PD-1 monotherapy demonstrated higher 12-month overall survival (53%) versus anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy (34%).
- Current systemic therapies, including anti-PD-1, show limited activity against metastatic acral melanoma.
Conclusions:
- Metastatic acral melanoma has a poor prognosis despite various systemic therapies.
- Anti-PD-1 therapy is the most active treatment identified but still shows limited efficacy.
- Further research is crucial to develop more effective treatments for metastatic acral melanoma.

