Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery
Published on: December 1, 2023
Lens Opacities Classification System III-based artificial intelligence program for automatic cataract grading
Qiang Lu1, Ling Wei, Wenwen He
1From the Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Eye Institute, Eye and Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Key Laboratory of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Shanghai, China (Q. Lu, Wei, W. He, K. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Rong, Zhao, Cai, Y. Lu, Zhu); Vistel AI Lab, Visionary Intelligence Ltd., Beijing, China (Wang, X. He, Ding); School of Elecronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China (Wu).
Purpose:
To establish and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted automatic cataract grading program based on the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III).
Setting:
Eye and Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Design:
AI training.
Methods:
Advanced deep-learning algorithms, including Faster R-CNN and ResNet, were applied to the localization and analysis of the region of interest. An internal dataset from the EENT Hospital of Fudan University and an external dataset from the Pujiang Eye Study were used for AI training, validation, and testing. The datasets were automatically labeled on the AI platform regarding the capture mode and cataract grading based on the LOCS III.
Results:
The AI program showed reliable capture mode recognition, grading, and referral capability for nuclear and cortical cataract grading. In the internal and external datasets, 99.4% and 100% of automatic nuclear grading, respectively, had an absolute prediction error of ≤1.0, with a satisfactory referral capability (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.983 for the internal dataset; 0.977 for the external dataset); 75.0% (internal dataset) and 93.5% (external dataset) of the automatic cortical grades had an absolute prediction error of ≤1.0, with AUCs of 0.855 and 0.795 for referral, respectively. Good consistency was observed between automatic and manual grading when both nuclear and cortical cataracts were evaluated. However, automatic grading of posterior subcapsular cataracts was impractical.
Conclusions:
The AI program proposed in this study showed robust grading and diagnostic performance for both nuclear and cortical cataracts, based on LOCS III.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Glaucoma: Overview
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...

