Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
Configurational-based institutional analysis: Unbundling the multi-dimensional state fragility construct
Joshua K Ault1, Andrew Spicer2
1Thunderbird School of Global Management, Arizona State University, MC 1221, 400 E Van Buren, Ste 800, Phoenix, AZ 85004-2262 USA.
Abstract:
To guide researchers interested in replicating our configurational approach to comparative institutional analysis, we report on a methodology that builds from existing state fragility indices to differentiate between types of state fragility in 189 countries across the world. We first present the steps we used to identify three constituent dimensions of state fragility. We then report how we configured these first-order institutional measures to build a large-N, fuzzy set qualitative set analysis (fs/QCA) of variation in the degree and type of informal economic sectors found across the world. Our discussion of the methodology shows that:•Configurational-based analysis requires unbundling aggregate measures into constituent dimensions as a first step to analyzing possible systemic interactions.•Configurational-based analysis recognizes sources of cross-national diversity that aggregated or single dimensional metrics are unable to fully capture.
Related Concept Videos
Stability of structures
Deindividuation
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He...
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Three-Compartment Open Model

