Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

352
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
352
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.1K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.1K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.1K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.1K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

2.8K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
2.8K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.9K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.9K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

5.1K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
5.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automated emotion recognition via video-based semantic embeddings.

Frontiers in digital health·2026
Same author

Problematic pornography use and psychological distress: A longitudinal study in a large US sample.

Addictive behaviors·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "Child maltreatment in young adults with residential youth care background: Prevalence and post-placement trends" [Child Abuse Negl. 157C (2024) 107074].

Child abuse & neglect·2025
Same author

Child maltreatment in young adults with residential youth care background: Prevalence and post-placement trends.

Child abuse & neglect·2024
Same author

Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Reprogram the Tumor Microenvironment and Reduce Lung Cancer Regrowth after Crizotinib Treatment.

ACS nano·2024
Same author

Implementing machine learning techniques for continuous emotion prediction from uniformly segmented voice recordings.

Frontiers in psychology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.2K

A Group Comparison Test under Uncertain Group Membership.

Tobias A Bauer1, Alexandro Folster1, Tina Braun2

  • 1University of the BUNDESWEHR, MUNICH, Munich, Neubiberg, Germany.

Psychometrika
|August 26, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a method for comparing group means when exact group membership is unknown, using only probability information. The research explores the impact of probability values on information loss through theoretical analysis and simulations.

Keywords:
group uncertaintyt test

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.1K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.2K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.1K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Statistics
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Many psychology studies compare means across groups, but precise group membership is not always available.
  • Probabilistic group membership arises from classifiers, prevalence data, multilevel models, or expert ratings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a method for comparing group means when group membership is probabilistic.
  • To investigate the theoretical and simulated information loss associated with varying probability values.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a statistical method to handle probabilistic group membership in mean comparisons.
  • Conducted theoretical analyses to quantify information loss.
  • Performed large-scale simulations to evaluate the method's performance and information loss under different probability scenarios.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively compares group means even with incomplete membership information.
  • Information loss is quantifiable and dependent on the precision of probability estimates.
  • Simulations validated the theoretical findings on information loss.

Conclusions:

  • This method offers a viable solution for mean comparison in psychology when group membership is uncertain.
  • Understanding information loss is crucial for interpreting results based on probabilistic data.
  • The findings have implications for statistical practices in psychology and related fields.