Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Is American Joint Replacement Registry Data Representative of National Data? A Comparative Analysis
Kimberly R Porter1, Richard L Illgen, Bryan D Springer
1From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL (Porter), University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (Illgen), OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, NC (Springer), Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (Bozic), Midwest Orthopedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (Sporer), Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA (Huddleston), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Lewallen), and University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA (Browne).
The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) data closely represents national hip and knee arthroplasty trends. AJRR findings are generalizable to the broader US patient population, enhancing its utility for orthopedic research.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Arthroplasty Registries
- Health Services Research
Background:
- The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) is the largest US registry for total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA).
- The National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) provides a national benchmark for inpatient procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the representativeness of AJRR data compared to national THA and TKA procedures in the NIS.
- To determine if AJRR findings can be generalized to the broader US patient population.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of THA and TKA procedures from 2012-2018 (AJRR) and 2012-2016 (NIS).
- Calculation of Cohen d effect sizes to quantify differences in demographics, hospital volume, and geographic distribution.
- Inclusion of over 2.3 million primary THA and 3.4 million primary TKA procedures in the NIS, and 557,684 THA and 809,494 TKA procedures in the AJRR.
Main Results:
- Proportions of AJRR and NIS patients showed minimal differences in sex and age distributions (Cohen d ≤ 0.17).
- Small differences (Cohen d ≤ 0.34) were observed in hospital volume and geographic characteristics.
- AJRR demonstrated underrepresentation in Southern regions and low-volume hospitals, but overrepresentation in Northern and high-volume hospitals, mirroring overall trends.
Conclusions:
- Demographic, hospital volume, and geographic distributions are proportionally similar between AJRR and NIS databases.
- AJRR data is representative of the national experience, supporting the generalizability of its findings.
- The AJRR serves as a valuable and generalizable resource for understanding US hip and knee arthroplasty trends.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
Relative Risk

