Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

7.3K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.3K
Buffer Effectiveness02:19

Buffer Effectiveness

51.8K
Buffer solutions do not have an unlimited capacity to keep the pH relatively constant . Instead, the ability of a buffer solution to resist changes in pH relies on the presence of appreciable amounts of its conjugate weak acid-base pair. When enough strong acid or base is added to substantially lower the concentration of either member of the buffer pair, the buffering action within the solution is compromised.
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
51.8K
Patch Clamp01:18

Patch Clamp

5.9K
Many fundamental cell functions such as muscle contraction and nerve transmission rely on the electrical signals produced by the movement of positively and negatively charged ions across the cell membrane. One competent method to record current flowing across the whole cell or single ion channel is the patch-clamp technique.
In this method, a glass micropipette containing electrolyte solution is tightly sealed against a small portion of the cell membrane. As a result, a patch of the cell...
5.9K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experiential-sensorial adaptive system model for hospitality based on 360° VR videos and case-based reasoning.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Development of an accurate and rapid method for whole genome characterization of canine parvovirus.

Journal of virological methods·2023
Same author

Biological characteristics of a sub-population of cancer stem cells from two triple-negative breast tumour cell lines.

Heliyon·2021
Same author

Effect of group size on producer-scrounger strategies of Wistar rats.

Behavioural processes·2020
Same author

Late nail lesions rejection in a stable bilateral forearm allograft at 60 months posttransplantation.

Annals of plastic surgery·2014
Same author

The Spanish experience with hand, forearm, and arm transplantation.

Hand clinics·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 22, 2025

One-channel Cell-attached Patch-clamp Recording
13:07

One-channel Cell-attached Patch-clamp Recording

Published on: June 9, 2014

24.8K

Can the setup of a patch modulate finder's advantage?

Luis Alfaro1, Rosalva Cabrera2

  • 1Universidad De Guadalajara (CUValles), Mexico.

Behavioural Processes
|August 26, 2021
PubMed
Summary

The finder's advantage in social foraging is influenced by patch setup. Shorter distances between food patches increase the finder's advantage and food seeking behavior in rats.

Keywords:
Finder’s advantageFood-searchingPatch setupProducing-scroungingRate Maximization Model

More Related Videos

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

11.1K
Long-term Sensory Conflict in Freely Behaving Mice
06:12

Long-term Sensory Conflict in Freely Behaving Mice

Published on: February 20, 2019

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 22, 2025

One-channel Cell-attached Patch-clamp Recording
13:07

One-channel Cell-attached Patch-clamp Recording

Published on: June 9, 2014

24.8K
Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

11.1K
Long-term Sensory Conflict in Freely Behaving Mice
06:12

Long-term Sensory Conflict in Freely Behaving Mice

Published on: February 20, 2019

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Animal Behavior
  • Foraging Strategies

Background:

  • The finder's advantage, a key factor in social foraging, is modulated by environmental conditions.
  • Patch setup, including distribution and distance, can significantly influence foraging strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how patch distribution (Square vs. Zig-zag) and distance (Small vs. Large) affect the finder's advantage in Wistar rats.
  • To analyze the impact of patch configurations on social foraging strategies, specifically production and scrounging.

Main Methods:

  • Wistar rats (n=4) foraged in a 4x3 array with four baited patches in varying configurations.
  • Foraging responses were categorized as production (seeking food) or scrounging (following others).
  • The frequency of each strategy was used to calculate the finder's advantage under different patch setups.

Main Results:

  • Shorter distances between patches led to more frequent production behavior.
  • A higher finder's advantage was observed in patch setups with short distances.
  • These findings suggest local enhancement and simultaneous patch exploitation play a role in smaller setups.

Conclusions:

  • Patch distance is a critical environmental factor influencing the finder's advantage in social foraging.
  • The spatial arrangement of resources significantly impacts the balance between seeking and scrounging behaviors.
  • Understanding these dynamics provides insights into the evolution of social foraging strategies.