Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

A Reference Broth Microdilution Method for Dalbavancin In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria that Grow Aerobically
Published on: September 9, 2015
Broth Microdilution and Gradient Diffusion Strips vs. Reference Agar Dilution Method: First Evaluation for
Florian Baquer1, Asma Ali Sawan1,2, Michel Auzou3
1Laboratory of Bacteriology, Strasbourg University Hospital, F-67000 Strasbourg, France.
Evaluating commercial antimicrobial susceptibility tests for anaerobic bacteria revealed varying reliability. Broth microdilution and gradient diffusion methods showed promise, particularly for vancomycin, metronidazole, and piperacillin/tazobactam, but require further validation.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Resistance
Background:
- Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for anaerobic bacteria presents significant challenges.
- Standardized methods like broth microdilution and diffusion strips are crucial for guiding treatment, yet their reliability needs rigorous assessment.
- Current evaluations often lack comparison against established reference methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of two commercial broth microdilution kits and one gradient diffusion strip method for anaerobic bacteria AST.
- To compare these methods against the agar dilution reference method for key antimicrobial agents.
- To assess analytical performance according to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of two broth microdilution kits (MICRONAUT-S Anaerobes® MIC, Sensititre Anaerobe MIC®) and one gradient diffusion strip (Liofilchem®).
- Testing of 47 Clostridiales isolates (Clostridium, Clostridioides, Hungatella species).
- Comparison against the agar dilution reference method for six antimicrobial molecules, assessing essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA).
Main Results:
- Essential and categorical agreements varied significantly across methods and antimicrobial agents.
- Vancomycin demonstrated high agreement (above 90% EA and CA) across all three tested methods.
- Metronidazole, piperacillin/tazobactam, and vancomycin achieved categorical agreement meeting FDA criteria for Gram-positive anaerobic infections.
- Clindamycin exhibited the highest error rates among the tested agents.
Conclusions:
- Commercial AST methods show potential but exhibit variable performance for anaerobic bacteria.
- Vancomycin, metronidazole, and piperacillin/tazobactam appear reliable for testing key anaerobic pathogens.
- Further multicenter studies are essential to validate these findings and establish robust AST protocols for anaerobes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Techniques for Isolation of Pure Cultures
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods

