Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Modular revision strategy with bispherical augments in severe acetabular deficiency reconstruction
Guo-Yuan Li1, Xiao-Qi Zhang1, Min Chen1
1Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, 17 Lujiang Road, Hefei, 230000, People's Republic of China.
Bispherical augments offer comparable clinical and radiological outcomes to tantalum augments for severe acetabular deficiency in hip revision surgery. This study demonstrates bispherical augments as a reliable alternative for complex total hip arthroplasty reconstructions.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Arthroplasty
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Reconstructing severe acetabular deficiency during total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions presents significant surgical challenges.
- Restoring the hip center of rotation (HCOR) and addressing bone loss are critical for successful outcomes.
- Novel bispherical augments (BA) have been developed to manage acetabular bone defects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of bispherical augments (BA) versus porous tantalum augments (TA) in revision THA for severe acetabular deficiency.
- To evaluate the efficacy of BA in restoring the hip center of rotation (HCOR) and correcting leg length discrepancy (LLD).
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 25 patients receiving BA and 22 patients receiving TA for revision THA between July 2017 and December 2018.
- Clinical outcomes assessed via Harris hip scores, with radiographic evaluation including HCOR and LLD correction.
- Follow-up averaged 2.9 years, with 25 hips in the BA group and 20 hips in the TA group available for final analysis.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in Harris hip scores, HCOR, or LLD correction between the BA and TA groups.
- Bispherical augments were predominantly placed in acetabular zone II, while tantalum augments favored zone I (P=0.010).
- The BA group required more screws for fixation (mean 2.1 vs. 1.3, P=0.000), with no evidence of implant loosening or migration in either group. One dislocation occurred in the BA group, managed successfully with closed reduction.
Conclusions:
- Bispherical augments demonstrate comparable clinical and radiological outcomes to tantalum augments in revision THA with severe acetabular deficiency.
- Bispherical augments represent a reliable alternative surgical technique for complex acetabular reconstruction.
- Further research may explore long-term outcomes and optimal placement strategies for bispherical augments.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
10:42A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020