Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
Improving domain definition and outcome instrument selection: Lessons learned for OMERACT from imaging
Maria Antonietta D'Agostino1, Dorcas E Beaton2, Lara J Maxwell3
1Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Rheumatology UOC, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy; UVSQ, Inserm U1173, Infection et inflammation, Laboratory of Excellence INFLAMEX, Université Paris-Saclay, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.1 Instrument Selection Algorithm (OFISA) was updated to improve the selection of imaging instruments. Key lessons emphasize defining measurement domains and identifying variability sources for better research outcomes.
Failed At:
2026-06-19T13:48:27.192204+00:00
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

