Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening
Jane Chudleigh1, Pru Holder2, Louise Moody3
1School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK j.chudleigh@city.ac.uk.
Objective:
To implement and evaluate co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results and make recommendations for future research and practice.
Design:
A process evaluation underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory.
Setting:
Three National Health Service provider organisations in England.
Participants:
Twenty-four healthcare professionals (7 newborn screening laboratory staff and 24 clinicians) and 18 parents were interviewed.
Interventions:
Three co-designed interventions were implemented in practice: standardised laboratory proformas, communication checklists and an email/letter template.
Primary Outcome Measures:
Acceptability and feasibility of the co-designed interventions.
Results:
Auditing the implementation of these interventions revealed between 58%-76% of the items on the laboratory proforma and 43%-80% of items on the communication checklists were completed. Interviews with healthcare professionals who had used the interventions in practice provided positive feedback in relation to the purpose of the interventions and the ease of completion both of which were viewed as enhancing communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results. Interviews with parents highlighted the perceived benefit of the co-designed interventions in terms of consistency, pacing and tailoring of information as well as providing reliable information to families following communication of the positive newborn bloodspot screening result. The process evaluation illuminated organisational and contextual barriers during implementation of the co-designed interventions in practice.
Conclusion:
Variations in communication practices for positive newborn bloodspot screening results continue to exist. The co-designed interventions could help to standardise communication of positive newborn screening results from laboratories to clinicians and from clinicians to parents which in turn could improve parents' experience of receiving a positive newborn bloodspot screening result. Implementation highlighted some organisational and contextual barriers to effective adoption of the co-designed interventions in practice.
Trial Registration Number:
ISRCTN15330120.
Related Concept Videos
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nursing Evaluation
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis
The nursing process considers the patient's emotional and physical well-being. The process can be repeated or stopped at any point if judged essential. Assessment is the first step in the nursing...
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...

