Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

05:47
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
770
Research on enterprise knowledge service based on semantic reasoning and data fusion
Bo Yang1,2, Meifang Yang1,2
1School of Information Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, 30013 China.
Neural Computing & Applications
|August 30, 2021
Summary
This study introduces an enterprise knowledge service model for managing complex risks in the big data era. It enhances rapid response to risk incidents using semantic reasoning and data fusion for better enterprise risk management.
Area of Science:
- Enterprise Risk Management
- Big Data Analytics
- Knowledge Management Systems
Background:
- Big data presents challenges in enterprise risk management due to massive, multisource, and heterogeneous information.
- Current risk management often suffers from insufficient knowledge fusion and low intelligence levels.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore enterprise knowledge service models for rapid response to risk incidents.
- To clarify the elements of knowledge service models in risk management.
- To address challenges of multisource and heterogeneous enterprise risk information.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing semantic reasoning and data fusion for knowledge integration.
- Employing knowledge graph analysis methods.
- Decomposing the risk domain knowledge service process into prewarning, in-event response, and postevent summary stages.
Main Results:
- Construction of a three-level knowledge service model (acquisition-organization-application) for risk domains.
- Integration of empirical knowledge with data-driven approaches.
- Demonstration of semantic reasoning and data fusion for expressing and organizing knowledge needs.
Conclusions:
- The proposed model offers solutions for enterprise managers in risk management.
- It enhances the ability to rapidly respond to risk incidents.
- It provides new avenues for interdisciplinary knowledge service theory innovation.
Related Concept Videos
Inductive Reasoning
63.5K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
63.5K
Deductive Reasoning
62.3K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
62.3K
Reasoning
188
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
188
Reason and Intuition
7.1K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
5.1K
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
5.1K
Impact of Schemas
44
Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...
44

