Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using a translational data platform to create clinical-grade genome-informed risk assessments.

JAMIA open·2026
Same author

Solutions for Unexpected Challenges Encountered when Integrating Research Genomics Results into the EHR.

ACI open·2026
Same author

Evaluating the feasibility of the CIPHER metadata framework towards building a conceptual phenotype standard.

JAMIA open·2026
Same author

A Privacy Nihilist Perspective on Clinical Data Sharing: Open Clinical Data Sharing is Dead, Long Live the Walled Garden.

Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management·2026
Same author

Pathogen-specific host responses define distinct pneumonia endotypes in the human lung.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Navigating data sharing in research.

American journal of human genetics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Rapid Analysis and Exploration of Fluorescence Microscopy Images
11:41

Rapid Analysis and Exploration of Fluorescence Microscopy Images

Published on: March 19, 2014

12.5K

Phenoflow: A Microservice Architecture for Portable Workflow-based Phenotype Definitions.

Martin Chapman1, Luke V Rasmussen2, Jennifer A Pacheco2

  • 1King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science Proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science
|August 30, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Phenotype definitions are challenging to share across institutions. A new workflow model and Phenoflow authoring architecture improve the portability of computable phenotype definitions, enhancing study transparency.

More Related Videos

Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics – Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities
09:57

Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics – Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities

Published on: July 12, 2018

12.2K
An Integrated Workflow of Identification and Quantification on FDR Control-Based Untargeted Metabolome
05:35

An Integrated Workflow of Identification and Quantification on FDR Control-Based Untargeted Metabolome

Published on: September 20, 2022

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Rapid Analysis and Exploration of Fluorescence Microscopy Images
11:41

Rapid Analysis and Exploration of Fluorescence Microscopy Images

Published on: March 19, 2014

12.5K
Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics – Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities
09:57

Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics – Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities

Published on: July 12, 2018

12.2K
An Integrated Workflow of Identification and Quantification on FDR Control-Based Untargeted Metabolome
05:35

An Integrated Workflow of Identification and Quantification on FDR Control-Based Untargeted Metabolome

Published on: September 20, 2022

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Informatics
  • Clinical Research Informatics
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Phenotyping is crucial for identifying patient cohorts but definitions often lack clarity, hindering cross-institutional portability.
  • Abstract phenotype definitions require computational implementation, which is frequently impeded by unclear practical guidance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel multi-layer, workflow-based model for phenotype definition.
  • To present Phenoflow, an authoring architecture for developing structured definitions and realizing them as computable phenotypes.
  • To evaluate the impact of the proposed model on the portability of phenotype definitions.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a multi-layer, workflow-based model for phenotype definition.
  • Creation of the Phenoflow authoring architecture to support structured definition development.
  • Evaluation of the model's impact on code-based (COVID-19) and logic-based (diabetes) phenotype definition portability using real-world datasets.

Main Results:

  • The proposed model and Phenoflow architecture significantly enhance the portability of phenotype definitions across different institutions.
  • Demonstrated successful implementation and evaluation on a dataset of 26,406 patients at North-western University.
  • The approach ensures the transparency of studies utilizing computable phenotypes.

Conclusions:

  • The workflow-based model and Phenoflow architecture effectively address the challenges in sharing phenotype definitions.
  • This work contributes to more transparent and reproducible clinical research by improving phenotype definition portability.
  • Facilitates the reliable identification of patient cohorts for diverse research applications.