Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

10:07
Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
19.1K
Developing Comprehensive Strategies to Evaluate Medical School Curricula
Sally A Santen1,2, Moshe Feldman1, Sara Weir3
1Office of Assessment, Evaluation and Scholarship, Virginia Commonwealth School of Medicine, Richmond, VA USA.
Medical Science Educator
|August 30, 2021
Summary
This guide offers medical schools a framework for curriculum evaluation using Kirkpatrick
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Curriculum Development
- Program Evaluation
Background:
- Medical school curriculum evaluation is crucial for documenting outcomes, learning effectiveness, quality improvement, and accreditation.
- Effective evaluation requires a structured approach with specific metrics to assess institutional goals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a roadmap and resource for medical schools to conduct meaningful curriculum evaluation.
- To outline a comprehensive methodology for assessing medical school curricula based on defined metrics.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Kirkpatrick's levels of outcomes: reactions, learning, behavior, and impact.
- Incorporated national metrics (United States Medical Licensing Examinations, American Association of Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire) and internal program data (graduation rates, attrition, specialty matching).
- Examined student performance in preclerkship and clinical phases, learning environment, mistreatment data, and attitudinal instruments (stress, wellness, burnout, patient safety).
Main Results:
- Mapping student outcomes to curricular objectives is essential for evaluating curriculum effectiveness.
- A composite of various outcome measures provides a holistic understanding of the curriculum.
- Analysis of internal and external metrics, student performance, and learning environment data informs curriculum improvement.
Conclusions:
- A systematic approach to medical school curriculum evaluation is vital for continuous improvement.
- Utilizing a multi-faceted evaluation strategy, including Kirkpatrick's levels and diverse data sources, enhances program effectiveness.
- This monograph serves as a valuable resource for institutions seeking to refine their medical education programs.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
2.2K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.2K
Metacognition
345
Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
345
Nursing Evaluation
3.8K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.8K
Kaplan-Meier Approach
317
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
317
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
180
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
180
Survival Curves
391
Survival curves are graphical representations that depict the survival experience of a population over time, offering an intuitive way to track the proportion of individuals who remain event-free at each time point. These curves are widely used in fields such as medicine, public health, and reliability engineering to visualize and compare survival probabilities across different groups or conditions.
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
391

