Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Total Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy
Published on: August 22, 2025
Esophageal Perforation and EVAC in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series of Four Children
Laura Antonia Ritz1, Mohammad Samer Hajji2, Tobias Schwerd2
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Insights
Endoscopic esophageal vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) is a feasible treatment for pediatric esophageal perforation (EP). Combining EVAC with Replogle Suction Catheter (RSC) therapy shows promising outcomes, stabilizing patients and reducing inflammation.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Endoscopic Therapy
Background:
- Esophageal perforation (EP) in children is rare but severe, with high morbidity and mortality.
- Endoscopic esophageal vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) shows promise in adults, but data in pediatric patients are limited.
- Further evaluation of EVAC efficacy in pediatric EP is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the technical feasibility and effectiveness of EVAC therapy for pediatric esophageal perforation.
- To compare outcomes of EVAC alone, Replogle Suction Catheter (RSC) alone, and combination therapy.
- To assess the role of EVAC in preparing for potential re-do surgery.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of five pediatric EP cases treated between October 2018 and April 2020.
- Therapies included EVAC, ArgyleTM Replogle Suction Catheter (RSC), or both.
- Data collected on treatment outcomes, complications, and long-term follow-up.
Main Results:
- EVAC alone did not achieve complete EP closure but stabilized patients and reduced inflammation.
- Four of five patients healed with subsequent RSC therapy.
- Two patients developed stenosis, successfully treated with dilatations.
- One patient required surgery for recurrent fistula after EVAC therapy.
Conclusions:
- EVAC is technically feasible and promising for pediatric EP, regardless of cause.
- EVAC can be stopped when inflammation and CRP levels decrease, even without complete mucosal healing.
- Combination therapy with EVAC and RSC appears more effective than RSC alone.
- EVAC may improve tissue condition for subsequent surgeries.
Abstract:
Introduction: In pediatric patients, esophageal perforation (EP) is rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates of up to 20-30%. In addition to standard treatment options, endoscopic esophageal vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) therapy has shown promising results, especially in adult patients. Thus far, the only data on technical success and effectiveness of EVAC in pediatric patients were published in 2018 by Manfredi et al. at Boston Children's Hospital. The sparse data on EVAC in children indicates that this promising technique has been barely utilized in pediatric patients. More data are needed to evaluate efficacy and outcomes of this technique in pediatric patients. Method: We reviewed five cases of therapy using EVAC, ArgyleTM Replogle Suction Catheter (RSC), or both on pediatric patients with EP in our institution between October 2018 and April 2020. Results: Five patients with EP (median 3.4 years; 2 males) were treated with EVAC, RSC, or a combination. Complete closure of EP was not achieved after EVAC alone, though patients' health stabilized and inflammation and size of EP decreased after EVAC. Four patients then were treated with RSC until the EP healed. One patient needed surgery as the recurrent fistula did not heal sufficiently after 3 weeks of EVAC therapy. Two patients developed stenosis and were successfully treated with dilatations. One patient treated with RSC alone showed persistent EP after 5 weeks. Conclusion: EVAC in pediatric patients is technically feasible and a promising method to treat EP, regardless of the underlying cause. EVAC therapy can be terminated as soon as local inflammation and C-reactive protein levels decrease, even if the mucosa is not healed completely at that time. A promising subsequent treatment is RSC. An earlier switch to RSC can substantially reduce the need of anesthesia during subsequent treatments. Our findings indicate that EVAC is more effective than RSC alone. In some cases, EVAC can be used to improve the tissues condition in preparation for a re-do surgery. At 1 year after therapy, all but one patient demonstrated sufficient weight gain. Further prospective studies with a larger cohort are required to confirm our observations from this small case series.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Trachea
Anatomical Features:
Location: About half of the trachea is situated in the neck, anterior to the esophagus, and extends from the larynx (at the level of...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...

