Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multimodal contrastive prognostication framework for early neurological outcome prediction in post-cardiac arrest patients.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Regenerative bone-targeted nanoparticles modulate osteoclast function.

Nanoscale horizons·2026
Same author

Recapitulating the Native Tendon Environment in a Synthetic 3D Anisotropic Hydrogel as an Engineered Extracellular Matrix.

ACS applied bio materials·2026
Same author

Temporal transcriptomic profiling of bone autograft healing reveals dynamic immune, vascular, and osteogenic programs.

Bone·2026
Same author

Local control of T cell fate in lymph nodes safely and durably reverses myelin-driven autoimmunity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Reproducible 3D bioprinting of <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> to create model oral biofilms.

Microbiology spectrum·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.9K

Biomaterials for Orthopaedic Diagnostics and Theranostics.

Marian A Ackun-Farmmer1,2, Clyde T Overby1,2, Brittany E Haws3

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering
|August 30, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Biomaterials offer advanced diagnostics and theranostics for orthopaedic conditions, overcoming limitations of current methods for early detection and treatment. These innovative materials promise improved patient outcomes in diverse applications like cancer, fractures, and infections.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Use of Apple-Derived Cellulose Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
09:49

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Use of Apple-Derived Cellulose Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.1K
Combined In vivo Optical and &#181;CT Imaging to Monitor Infection, Inflammation, and Bone Anatomy in an Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Mice
18:40

Combined In vivo Optical and µCT Imaging to Monitor Infection, Inflammation, and Bone Anatomy in an Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Mice

Published on: October 16, 2014

17.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.9K
Author Spotlight: Insights into the Use of Apple-Derived Cellulose Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
09:49

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Use of Apple-Derived Cellulose Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.1K
Combined In vivo Optical and &#181;CT Imaging to Monitor Infection, Inflammation, and Bone Anatomy in an Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Mice
18:40

Combined In vivo Optical and µCT Imaging to Monitor Infection, Inflammation, and Bone Anatomy in an Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Mice

Published on: October 16, 2014

17.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopaedic Medicine
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Conventional orthopaedic diagnostics have limitations in early and accurate pathology detection.
  • Timely intervention is critical for many orthopaedic conditions, but current methods often fall short.
  • Existing diagnostic tools struggle with subtle or early-stage pathologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the potential of biomaterials in developing advanced diagnostic and theranostic tools for orthopaedics.
  • To address the shortcomings of conventional diagnostic methods in early disease detection.
  • To highlight the promise of biomaterials for improving clinical translation in orthopaedic treatments.

Main Methods:

  • Development of diagnostic and theranostic biomaterials, including nanoparticles and scaffolds.
  • Application of modular and holistic design principles for biomaterial innovation.
  • Systemic and local delivery strategies for therapeutic and diagnostic agents.

Main Results:

  • Biomaterials show significant promise in overcoming diagnostic limitations in orthopaedics.
  • Nanoparticles and scaffolds can be engineered for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
  • Advancements enable early detection and intervention for various orthopaedic pathologies.

Conclusions:

  • Biomaterial-based diagnostics and theranostics offer a promising avenue for advancing orthopaedic care.
  • These innovations can lead to improved patient treatments for conditions like cancer, fractures, and infections.
  • Successful clinical translation of these advanced biomaterials is anticipated.