Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Good Is the Machine at the Imitation Game? On Stylistic Characteristics of AI-Generated Images.

Journal of imaging·2025
Same author

Parallax Inference for Robust Temporal Monocular Depth Estimation in Unstructured Environments.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Scaling up SoccerNet with multi-view spatial localization and re-identification.

Scientific data·2022
Same author

Survey and Synthesis of State of the Art in Driver Monitoring.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Multi-Timescale Drowsiness Characterization Based on a Video of a Driver's Face.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2018
Same journal

Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same journal

Coronary Artery Anomalies and Anatomical Variants: Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Background.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same journal

YoLeTooth: A Unified Framework for Joint Tooth Segmentation and Periapical Lesion Detection in Panoramic Radiographs.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same journal

Radiomics-Guided Multi-Sequence Learning for Pathological Complete Response Prediction from Breast MRI with Missing Auxiliary Sequences.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same journal

Cutaneous Thermography in Arthropathies: Quantitative Imaging, Machine Learning, and Clinical Translation.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same journal

Two-Stage Dynamic Synergistic Segmentation Method for Myocardial Pathology.

Journal of imaging·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 22, 2025

AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells
06:03

AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells

Published on: June 23, 2023

614

Asynchronous Semantic Background Subtraction.

Anthony Cioppa1, Marc Braham1, Marc Van Droogenbroeck1

  • 1Montefiore Institute, University of Liège, Quartier Polytech 1, Allée de la Découverte 10, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

Journal of Imaging
|August 30, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Asynchronous Semantic Background Subtraction (ASBS) improves moving object segmentation by processing semantic and background streams at their native frame rates. This method enhances performance and maintains real-time operation, outperforming traditional methods.

Keywords:
background subtractionmotion detectionscene labelingsemantic segmentationvideo processing

More Related Videos

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.0K
Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique
04:48

Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique

Published on: July 5, 2024

576

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 22, 2025

AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells
06:03

AMEBaS: Automatic Midline Extraction and Background Subtraction of Ratiometric Fluorescence Time-Lapses of Polarized Single Cells

Published on: June 23, 2023

614
Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.0K
Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique
04:48

Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique

Published on: July 5, 2024

576

Area of Science:

  • Computer Vision
  • Video Analysis
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Semantic Background Subtraction (SBS) combines semantic segmentation and background subtraction for moving object segmentation.
  • A key limitation of SBS is its operation at the slowest frame rate, typically from the semantic segmentation stream.
  • This bottleneck hinders real-time performance and efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce Asynchronous Semantic Background Subtraction (ASBS) for efficient moving object segmentation.
  • To enable the combination of semantic segmentation and background subtraction algorithms asynchronously.
  • To achieve high performance while operating at the fastest possible frame rate.

Main Methods:

  • ASBS analyzes temporal pixel feature evolution to infer semantic decisions when unavailable.
  • It integrates semantic segmentation with any background subtraction algorithm asynchronously.
  • A feedback mechanism enhances background model updating strategies for improved decision-making.

Main Results:

  • ASBS achieves performance close to SBS but operates at the faster background subtraction frame rate.
  • The method systematically improves performance, even with significantly different stream frame rates.
  • Real-time algorithms like ViBe, enhanced by ASBS, compete with state-of-the-art non-real-time methods like SuBSENSE.

Conclusions:

  • ASBS offers a significant advancement in asynchronous video object segmentation.
  • It overcomes the frame rate limitations of traditional SBS methods.
  • ASBS enables efficient and effective real-time moving object detection and segmentation.