Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

3D Printing - Evaluating Particle Emissions of a 3D Printing Pen
Published on: October 9, 2020
Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment
Carson Studders1, Ian Fraser1, Joshua W Giles1
1University of Victoria Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Biomedical Research, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Abstract:
Aim: COVID-19 resulted in a shortage of personal protective equipment. Community members united to 3D-print face shield headbands to support local healthcare workers. This study examined factors altering print time and strength. Materials & methods: Combinations of infill density (50%, 100%), shell thickness (0.8, 1.2 mm), line width (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm), and layer height (0.1 mm, 0.2 mm) were evaluated through tensile testing, finite element analysis, and printing time. Results: Strength increased with increased infill (p < 0.001) and shell thickness (p < 0.001). Layer height had no effect on strength. Increasing line width increased strength (p < 0.001). Discussion: Increasing layer height and line width decreased print time by 50 and 39%, respectively. Increased shell thickness did not alter print time. These changes are recommended for printing.
Related Concept Videos
Personal Protective Equipment
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings I: Donning

