[Assessing ear noise in expert opinion: Possibility, plausibility and probability]

Tinnitus as a subjective, individual sensation defies objective proof. In the assessment situation, tinnitus must also be distinguished from physiological or spontaneous hearing sensations.With regard to the new German "Königsteiner Recommendation" and the verdicts of the last few years, against the background of the different concepts of causality in the statutory and private accident insurance, a stringent examination to determine whether there is a sufficiently high probability of an accident-related subjective ear noise is necessary in the assessment. In order to create a comprehensible and comparable basis, the proposal of a plausibility check with the recording of 5 criteria - appropriate event, immediacy, reproducibility on the basis of today's examination methods of tinnitus masking and matching, persistence and fixation and the recording with a non-suggestive question was subjected to a review.The review shows that the requirements for the respective standard of proof can be fulfilled with the given steps of proof. The simple possibility of the presence of ringing in the ears can be systematically led to the probability of the presence by means of the plausibility criteria, which include psychoacoustic procedures, as well as open questions. This creates the prerequisites for a comprehensible causal consideration between the event and the reported tinnitus according to current medical-scientific knowledge.