Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

7.6K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
7.6K
P-value01:10

P-value

7.5K
P-value is one of the most crucial concepts in statistics.
P-value stands for the probability value.  P-value is the probability that, if the null hypothesis is true, the results from another randomly selected sample will be as extreme or more extreme as the results obtained from the given sample.
A large P-value calculated from the data indicates to  not reject the null hypothesis. But a higher P-value does not mean that the null hypothesis is true. The smaller the P-value, the more...
7.5K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.9K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.9K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.9K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

7.0K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
7.0K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.2K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Representation and generalizability in clinical research: Back to basics.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same author

A Short Dietary Screener Captures Food Items and Dietary Patterns That Associate With Inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Crohn's & colitis 360·2025
Same author

Belantamab mafodotin plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-7): updated overall survival analysis from a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

The Lancet. Oncology·2025
Same author

Inverse probability weighted Bayesian dynamic borrowing for estimation of marginal treatment effects with application to hybrid control arm oncology studies.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2025
Same author

Tutorial on Conditional Simulations With a Tumor Size-Overall Survival Model to Support Oncology Drug Development.

CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology·2025
Same author

Development of a Joint Tumor Size-Overall Survival Modeling and Simulation Framework Supporting Oncology Development Decision-Making.

CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology·2025
Same journal

Erratum.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2023
Same journal

Validity of direct bilateral axillary arterial cannulation in emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2023
Same journal

Evaluation of midterm outcomes after Shone's complex surgery: Analysis of reoperation and mortality risk factors.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2023
Same journal

Subannular procedures on papillary muscles for secondary mitral valve regurgitation repair.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2022
Same journal

Safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to warfarin after cardiac surgery.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2022
Same journal

Impact of rapid rehabilitation surgery on perioperative nursing in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Conditional uncertainty: Misinterpretations of "significant" p values.

Shari Messinger Cayetano1, Alejandro Mantero2

  • 1Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

Journal of Cardiac Surgery
|August 31, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Misusing p values leads to incorrect scientific conclusions. This study highlights common p value misinterpretations and suggests alternatives for accurate statistical analysis and research validity.

Keywords:
NPVPPVconditional probabilityp valuesensitivityspecificity

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K
Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K
Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Statistical inference
  • Research methodology
  • Scientific communication

Background:

  • P values are frequently misinterpreted, leading to flawed research conclusions.
  • Concerns regarding p value shortcomings and misinterpretations are widely debated in the statistical community.
  • Misapplication of p values can undermine experimental design and statistical validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate common misuses of p values in scientific interpretation.
  • To discuss the fundamental issues of conditional probability and diagnostic accuracy misapplication.
  • To propose remedies for improving statistical analysis and inference.

Main Methods:

  • Review of literature and examples of p value misuse.
  • Analysis of misinterpretations related to conditional probability and diagnostic accuracy.
  • Discussion of collaborative approaches to enhance research validity.

Main Results:

  • P value misapplication leads to misleading conclusions and invalidates statistical approaches.
  • Fundamental errors involve misinterpreting conditional probability and diagnostic accuracy measures.
  • Team science and interdisciplinary collaboration offer a path to remedy these issues.

Conclusions:

  • Correct interpretation of statistical measures is crucial for valid research.
  • Addressing misinterpretations of p values requires a deeper understanding of probability and accuracy metrics.
  • Fostering collaboration between clinical and biostatistical scientists can improve research integrity and outcomes.