Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

19:15
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
86.7K
An Artificial Neural Network-Based Pediatric Mortality Risk Score: Development and Performance Evaluation Using Data
Niema Ghanad Poor1,2, Nicholas C West3, Rama Syamala Sreepada1,3
1Research Institute, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
JMIR Medical Informatics
|August 31, 2021
Summary
A simple artificial neural network (ANN) model slightly outperformed traditional logistic regression models, including PIM-2 and PRISM-III, for predicting pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) mortality risk. Further research may explore more sophisticated models for clinical significance.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Intensive Care
- Machine Learning in Medicine
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Quantifying pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) illness severity aids timely intervention.
- Existing risk models like PIM-2 and PRISM-III use routine admission data.
- Artificial neural networks (ANNs) show potential for improved performance over regression models in healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of ANNs against logistic regression models for pediatric mortality risk estimation in the PICU.
- To evaluate ANN models using data comparable to PIM-2 and PRISM-III.
- To assess the utility of ANNs in predicting mortality for critically ill children.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a dataset of 102,945 patients from North American PICUs with infection-related diagnoses.
- Developed a 2-layer ANN model and a logistic regression model using PIM-2 and PRISM-III features.
- Preprocessed data by imputing missing values and normalizing variables.
- Compared model performance using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC).
Main Results:
- The best-performing ANN (normalized data) achieved an AUROC of 0.871 and AUPRC of 0.372.
- This ANN outperformed PIM-2 (AUROC 0.805, AUPRC 0.234) and PRISM-III (AUROC 0.844, AUPRC 0.348).
- The ANN also showed superior performance compared to the logistic regression model (AUROC 0.862, AUPRC 0.329).
Conclusions:
- A simple 2-layer ANN model demonstrated slightly better performance than benchmark models (PIM-2, PRISM-III) and logistic regression.
- The observed performance gains may not yet translate to clinically significant improvements.
- Further investigation into advanced ANN architectures and data imputation techniques is warranted.

