Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

Reinforcement Schedules

Reinforcement Schedules

Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Use of features and geometry in leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius).

Behavioural processes·2021

Same author

Recognition of novelty in leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius) and tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum).

Behavioural processes·2021

Same author

Simplicity From Complexity in Vertebrate Behavior: Macphail () Revisited.

Frontiers in psychology·2020

Same author

Sex differences in serial pattern learning in mice.

Behavioural processes·2019

Same author

Adolescent exposure to fluoxetine impairs serial pattern learning in the serial multiple choice (SMC) task in adult rats.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2019

Same author

Tiger salamanders' (Ambystoma tigrinum) use of features.

Behavioural processes·2019

Same journal

Shining a light on jellyfish behaviour: Enhanced motor activity and positive phototaxis in Aurelia coerulea.

Behavioural processes·2026

Same journal

Detour-task performance in color polymorphic male mosquitofish.

Behavioural processes·2026

Same journal

Behavioral and physiological changes during the estrous cycle of socially housed female guinea pigs.

Behavioural processes·2026

Same journal

Flexible time-series analysis: A dynamically aware method for inferring directed dependencies in behavioral data.

Behavioural processes·2026

Same journal

Effects of group size and landmarks on escape behavior of three fish species.

Behavioural processes·2026

Same journal

Vocal individuality in two sympatric seabird species: The role of developmental strategy, analytical approach and sample size.

Behavioural processes·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Published on: June 22, 2015

Rats' use of hierarchical organization in serial pattern learning.

James D Rowan¹, Stephen B Fountain², Shannon M A Kundey³

¹Wesleyan College, United States.

Behavioural Processes

|August 31, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Rats struggled to learn sequences with pattern violations, and did not transfer these violations to earlier parts of the sequence. Restle's hierarchical model does not fully explain rats' complex sequence learning.

Keywords:

Pattern Rat Sequence learning Serial pattern learning

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder

Published on: December 15, 2023

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Published on: June 22, 2015

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder

Published on: December 15, 2023

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

Area of Science:

Cognitive psychology
Animal behavior
Neuroscience

Background:

Organisms learn and perform patterned sequences, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood.
Restle's hierarchical model is a prominent theory suggesting hierarchical organization for sequence learning.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the accuracy of Restle's hierarchical model in explaining rats' patterned sequence learning.
To investigate how rats learn sequences with and without structural violations.

Main Methods:

Two experiments were conducted involving rats learning patterned sequences.
Experiment 1 compared learning of intact patterns versus patterns with a violation in the second half.
Experiment 2 explored learning of more complex patterns.

Main Results:

Rats exhibited greater difficulty learning patterns with violations.
Violations introduced in the second half of a pattern led to more errors in that section, not the first.
Results were inconsistent with Restle's model for both simple and complex patterns.

Conclusions:

Restle's hierarchical model does not fully account for rats' learning of complex patterned sequences.
Further research is needed to develop a more comprehensive model for sequence learning in rats.