Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring Cellular Processes by Modeling Ligands in Cryo-EM Maps
Published on: July 19, 2024
Learning from Docked Ligands: Ligand-Based Features Rescue Structure-Based Scoring Functions When Trained on Docked
Fergus Boyles1, Charlotte M Deane1, Garrett M Morris1
1Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, 24-29 St Giles', Oxford, OX1 3LB, United Kingdom.
Machine learning scoring functions perform worse on docked protein-ligand poses than crystal poses. A hybrid approach combining structure and ligand features improves predictions on docked poses, but generalization remains a challenge.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Drug discovery
- Machine learning in pharmacology
Background:
- Machine learning (ML) scoring functions excel with crystal structures for protein-ligand binding affinity.
- Their performance with computationally docked poses is less understood.
- Accurate binding affinity prediction is crucial for drug discovery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate ML scoring functions using docked versus crystallographic poses.
- To develop and assess a hybrid scoring function for improved docked pose prediction.
- To introduce a new validation dataset for binding affinity prediction.
Main Methods:
- Trained and tested ML scoring functions on both crystal and docked poses using PDBbind Core Sets.
- Developed a hybrid scoring function integrating structure-based and ligand-based features.
- Created and utilized the Updated DUD-E Diverse Subset for validation.
Main Results:
- ML scoring functions trained/tested on docked poses showed reduced performance compared to crystal poses.
- The hybrid scoring function achieved performance comparable to structure-based methods on crystal poses when using docked poses.
- The hybrid model sometimes generalized poorly to new protein targets.
Conclusions:
- Docked poses decrease ML scoring function performance for binding affinity prediction.
- Hybrid scoring functions offer a promising avenue for improving predictions with docked poses.
- Further development and validation benchmarks are needed for robust ML scoring functions.
More Related Videos
08:49Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
10:21Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
Published on: February 23, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Ligand Binding and Linkage
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...